"...as a gym owner...."?
Does "judgment proof" sound familiar? The limits of a "gym's" liability policy for NEGLIGENCE (try to find one for intentional torts) wouldn't cover the damages for the death of an employee with dependent children.
As for the "right to work" .... it sounds like you actually believe that protects the employer from an intentional tort claim? I'm not sure what law school you attended, but Obaminable went to Harvard and it didn't do him much good either. Still isn't!
Originally Posted by LexusLover
I responded to the hypothetical given me, so there’s that.
As to whatever you think your point is, you’re still as wrong as in the earlier posts. An employer telling their employee to get the vaccine or they will be terminated isn’t “negligence” by any definition. The D&O would protect the company and the owner from any suit against them but any suit would be dismissed. Further, as I’ve stated in numerous threads before, discrimination in the good ole US of A is quite legal as long as the reason for the discrimination isn’t due to a very limited number of reasons set forth in statute. Vaccination status isn’t an unlawful discrimination so an employer can feel free to discriminate at will.
As I said before, you have no clue what you’re talking about on either the insurance side or the tort side.