Ambers not telling the truth

I hate getting involved with the drama. That said, I don't know Amber but I'm sure that what she says she believes to be true. I do know TB and on many occasions he has flown me and at times a partner from Dallas to Midland all on his nickle complete with return ticket. He has always had the ex suite reserved with chilled champane,chocolate and strawberries and misc fruit waiting. The evening usually starts around 7pm and includes a nice dinner then play time until no later than 4 am, TB will be out the door by then and if your on a multi day you will see him the next day around 7pm (actually same day) He has never failed to settle up before hes left and usually leaves a tip as well as flowers and gifts (clothes perfume ect) He is never less than a perfect gentleman. This is just my experience many times with TB let the chips fall where they may.

It's not rape if you've already paid for it my friend. Implied consent was given when the eight hour session fee was placed in her hands. Money in the hands equals dick in the pussy. She didn't have to take the money if she didn't want to go through with the session. Originally Posted by CM

You're saying that once you pay for it then you can do no wrong, as in there's no limit, no boundaries, she's not allowed to say "no"?

Well I'm with EA on this one.NO matter how many times you have seen someone there is room for flaws....Now I have seen TB and everything was OK on his end..I had a great time got my money and came back home loved it...Now maybe Amber is just not for TB...Just take it let it go move on and dont see her again all make sense to me hope everything go good for both ends....Lession learned I hope

Wow, just wow. CM-somebody needs to beat your ass with a 2x4 covered in nails and dipped in a vat of hot oil.

I don't know either of the parties involved other than with interactions in chat. I know who I believe, but that's neither here nor there.

All I can say for sure is something went wrong-very wrong. And karma is a bitch-and the guilty party best believe it will come back around.

Meg

Nah . . . Let the WKs go on. Originally Posted by pyramider

They are running rampant on this thread Pyramider. Still no response/rebuttal from Amber here or the WTX thread?

It's not rape if you've already paid for it my friend. Implied consent was given when the eight hour session fee was placed in her hands. Money in the hands equals dick in the pussy. She didn't have to take the money if she didn't want to go through with the session. Originally Posted by CM

Are you serious, or are you just fucking with us? If you are serious, I strongly urge you to rethink your position on this (and probably other things in your life)...as you would be judged by most competent peers to be absolutely wrong. And yes, I used the word "judged" consciously as someday it may come to that if this is the way you conduct yourself, and no, you will not like the outcome. If you think "implied consent" covers you then I suggest we ask ShysterJohn and the other learned legal minds on here if you are correct.

This is as politically correct and polite a response to your post as I could come up with, the initial draft would have gotten me many points from our friends the mods... please rethink your attitudes towards women in general, especially ones who might have had a bit too much vino... Thank goodness TexasBrowning was there and not you that night.

I'm responding to the thread.

I am standing by my alert... and feel as tho my 34 YES reviews and no bad reviews... My character and personality Speak for itself.

For all of those that support me... thank you. For those of you that don't know me.. take the chance and you will support me as well.

Thank you all.
Love you all.

Sincerely,
Amber Rain

Amber,

Since the alert was apparently in a provider only forum (I may be wrong), would you mind sharing your side of the story? I think most of the guys here aren't even really sure what you're accusing TB of exactly.

I say its a classic case of difference of opinion.
Both parties have valid points.
Cut bait and move on.
No harm no foul.
AM out......

If you think "implied consent" covers you then I suggest we ask ShysterJohn and the other learned legal minds on here if you are correct. Originally Posted by TheDuck

The Texas Penal Code calls what we commonly refer to as "rape" by the phrase "sexual assault." Consent is not a defense to sexual assault; rather, the State must prove a lack of consent to prove the offense.

SEXUAL ASSAULT.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person:
(1) intentionally or knowingly:
(A) causes the penetration of the anus or sexual organ of another person by any means, without that person's consent;
(B) causes the penetration of the mouth of another person by the sexual organ of the actor, without that person's consent; or
(C) causes the sexual organ of another person, without that person's consent, to contact or penetrate the mouth, anus, or sexual organ of another person, including the actor;
* * *
(b) A sexual assault under Subsection (a)(1) is without the consent of the other person if:
(1) the actor compels the other person to submit or participate by the use of physical force or violence;
(2) the actor compels the other person to submit or participate by threatening to use force or violence against the other person, and the other person believes that the actor has the present ability to execute the threat;
(3) the other person has not consented and the actor knows the other person is unconscious or physically unable to resist;
(4) the actor knows that as a result of mental disease or defect the other person is at the time of the sexual assault incapable either of appraising the nature of the act or of resisting it;
(5) the other person has not consented and the actor knows the other person is unaware that the sexual assault is occurring;
(6) the actor has intentionally impaired the other person's power to appraise or control the other person's conduct by administering any substance without the other person's knowledge;
(7) the actor compels the other person to submit or participate by threatening to use force or violence against any person, and the other person believes that the actor has the ability to execute the threat;
* * *

See Texas Penal Code § 22.011.

I say its a classic case of difference of opinion.
Both parties have valid points.
Cut bait and move on.
No harm no foul.
AM out...... Originally Posted by (AM)

I tend to agree with you sir, but reading these he said/she said threads is the most fun I ever get in my boring life, with my clothes on...I hate it when a Mod closes one of them...

i dont see why the hell you went through all that trouble...

MAYBE if it was this one...
http://www.eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=22398
just sayin...

It's not rape if you've already paid for it my friend. Implied consent was given when the eight hour session fee was placed in her hands. Money in the hands equals dick in the pussy. She didn't have to take the money if she didn't want to go through with the session. Originally Posted by CM

Your either a troll or a scumbag. Either way I'm not your "friend".

Bareback her? Really? While she is passed out? I bet you own a few blow-up dolls.

The Duck covered the rest of my opinion on your little statement..

Your either a troll or a scumbag. Either way I'm not your "friend".

Bareback her? Really? While she is passed out? I bet you own a few blow-up dolls.

The Duck covered the rest of my opinion on your little statement.. Originally Posted by TonyStark

To answer your question, he's a troll.

To answer your question, he's a troll. Originally Posted by TheBizz

Yeah I just went and looked at his postings. But still a scumbag.