Hard to imagine, but from what I've read they weren't even that well armed for the first world war (same rifle, just fewer of them). And things didn't change until after Stalin died. From what I understand he pushed the bid for a new rifle to Simonov's SKS instead of Kalashnikov's AK47 because he didn't want to waste money on removable magazines the peasants would loose. Needless to say, the decision was re-considered once Uncle Joe went to (hopefully) his just rewards.
Every time I see that ratio (2 men to each rifle) I find it difficult to comprehend. Gotta be a little disconcerting...attempting to fight with somebody else right behind you waiting for THEIR turn with YOUR rifle!! But, then again....it's not YOUR rifle...or life....both are the property of the State! Originally Posted by Sisyphus
Bean counters have always been an issue, if Lincoln hadn't interceded the yankee invaders wouldn't have gotten repeating rifles, likewise entire warehouses full of BARs went unissued in WW1 because some bureaucrat was afraid the Huns would capture one and copy it, or so I heard.