Do you know anybody who is at a "Women's March"?

51% of white women voted for Trump.
My facebook feed has a lot of women wondering wtf they are protesting about. Originally Posted by gnadfly

There is always a % that doesn't get the word. Hint- not all are protesting.

That is why "they" lost the election. It wasn't the Russians!



And people are fed up with it. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Those are your people aren't they little democrat?

^^^^^^^And they said it couldn't be done.....Shitstain's been outed.
Look closely: white cap, grinnin' ear-to-ear....scamperin' home to wash her soiled panties in all that spankin' new laundry soap. Fuck yeah, who needs to clip stinkin' coupons, right? Originally Posted by Chateau Becot

And not a ONE of them carrying stolen W-O-R-K boots in their grubby paws ! Bet they would if someone would make some workboots under the " Jordan " name !!

Those are your people aren't they little democrat? Originally Posted by wordup666

I don't own any people. Do you?

As for their Party affiliation I doubt they are Democrats in the sense that they voted in their lifetimes ... unless it's to draw straws on who throws the first brick through a window to steal shit!

I don't own any people. Do you?

As for their Party affiliation I doubt they are Democrats in the sense that they voted in their lifetimes ... unless it's to draw straws on who throws the first brick through a window to steal shit! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Aren't all thugs liberal democrats?

Aren't all thugs liberal democrats? Originally Posted by wordup666

I don't know "all thugs"! And neither do you, BTW.

Aren't all thugs liberal democrats? Originally Posted by wordup666

Poor little eehhhbuhhrrrr?

"I didn’t march because I personally feel marginalized. I marched because I can. I marched because a lot of women can’t, even if you don’t see them. I marched for women of privilege, women who don’t have shit, women who are raising awesome children with their same-sex partner who has to legally adopt the child that is biologically hers, and might find herself spontaneously unmarried in the eyes of the Supreme Court. I marched for women who need reproductive healthcare of any kind. I marched for the 17-year old pregnant girl who dropped out of school to sort my clothes at the dry cleaners for $7.25/hour. She has to quit when the baby comes because she doesn’t get any time off, paid or otherwise. Her next job will be minimum wage, too, because she hasn’t gotten her GED yet and doesn’t know if she can get in the night school program because she’ll need someone to stay with her newborn. I marched for the woman who was raped in college and still hasn’t even told her best friend, after all these years.
I even marched for you, Christy. Even if you don’t feel like you need anyone to march for you."

To Christy on Facebook who doesn't need the womens march.

I have the ability to see that just because I am able to do acoomplish something, doesn't mean that the woman next to me is able to. To see past my own privileges.

Oh, and just because I'm not being beheaded in Palestine at this very moment does NOT mean we should throw our hands up and call it good. There are still a LOT of womens issues that need to be worked on. Trans women, women of color, lesbians, women with disabilities, mental health issues or other medical issues, WOMEN WHO ARE SEX WORKERS, poor women, etc.

I marched because I'm not a bitch who lacks empathy.

...I marched because I can. Originally Posted by GemmaFox

Could you in 2009? 2010? 2011? 2012? 2013? 2014? 2015? 2016?

Yes, but you didn't!

All those years you let those who can't suffer!

This is not my first rodeo when it comes to social activism. You assume this is my first march and you know what they say about people who assume...

This is not my first rodeo when it comes to social activism. Originally Posted by GemmaFox

I didn't ask about a "rodeo."

I asked whether you were capable of marching in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, or 2016.

If you were capable, then why didn't you for the same as you did in 2017?

Were you weighing more than 190 at 5'4" back then?

I mean that could be a good reason not to be "marching."

Your evasive answer and redirection is a response, you know?

Got to give Trump credit...in one day, he got more women to get off their fat asses and walk than Michelle Obama did in 8 years!

Ah yes, The classic maneuver of using someone's weight as a response when you've run out of real replies. This, coming from a man who is hiding anonymously behind a screen. The irony is not lost.

"women who are raising awesome children with their same-sex partner who has to legally adopt the child that is biologically hers"

Are you seriously this stupid. Two lesbians can't make a baby sweetie. It is not biologically the mother's partner, that is why she has to adopt.

Ah yes, The classic maneuver of using someone's weight as a response when you've run out of real replies. This, coming from a man who is hiding anonymously behind a screen. The irony is not lost. Originally Posted by GemmaFox

As is often typical you are defensive when it is tactically an advantage, but in this case one is merely recognizing a potential disability that might have caused you to not participate in exercising your God given right to protest during those years prior to 2017 when your personal rights were being violated and the administration at that time was doing little about it beyond "studying" the "issue" to determine if discrimination actually existed ... without doing anything about it!

But since you don't want your obesity to be recognized as a disability, then I admire you for not diverting attention away from the real source of the burden you put on the rest of society by allowing yourself to gain too much weight, as opposed to it being the result of "natural forces" beyond your control.

As you have probably heard before: "My bad" for giving you "cover"!

Or in your mind did the discrimination pop up OVERNIGHT?