Because as a CHL holder I know I am held to a higher standard and de-escalation is my first priority. Originally Posted by boardmanThe same provisions of the Penal Code apply to civilians whether non-CHL or CHL and LE. The only distinction might be when one is called upon to justify the "shoot-don't shoot" decision the presence of training that is inconsistent with the facts of the response might cause you some difficulty in avoiding civil liability for your actions, and to some degree with criminal liability in a "close case." In that sense the amount of documented training would be a consideration, although I believe the threat level addressed by your response would probably be of greater consideration in the judgment decision.
The positive aspect of the CHL training is the academic portion that provides an insight into the appropriate decision making on the "use of force continuum."