Fake news, fake presidency, . . . . Fake science?

eccieuser9500's Avatar
Pay no attention to Assup. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn
Trust nobody. But listen to everyone.
Yes. Current and future. Who's to say it was high doses of exposure? Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
Well we are all being exposed to radiation all the time but in very minute doses that may not pose an immediate or long term threat to human health. There is also different types of Radiation such as Gamma, Beta or Alpha radiation. The type of radiation, dose and duration are all major factors on how you may be affected by it. If you are experiencing strange symptoms you may want to seek medical advice from someone who is familiar with radiation poisoning and it wouldn't hurt to get a couple of different opinions.

Jim
the_real_Barleycorn's Avatar
Don't forget solar radiation and background radiation. Many sub sailors end up with less a dosage than those on dry land.
eccieuser9500's Avatar
Well we are all being exposed to radiation all the time but in very minute doses that may not pose an immediate or long term threat to human health.

If you are experiencing strange symptoms you may want to seek medical advice from someone who is familiar with radiation poisoning and it wouldn't hurt to get a couple of different opinions.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Who to trust. Still the question. Thanks for participating.
eccieuser9500's Avatar
Dozens Of Men Got Sick During A Secret Training Exercise At A Nuclear Site In 1991. They're Still Fighting For Answers.


https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article...ng-exercise-at


Now that the nuclear couriers are long retired and no longer have their jobs on the line, 11 of them are finally speaking out. At least five of them say they’ve continued to suffer health effects, from chronic fatigue to sinus problems to decreased lung function to cancer, that they believe might be related to the incident 30 years ago.


In recent years, the number of former couriers who have gotten sick or died from cancer has continued to tick up. Roberts got prostate cancer in 2019. Bailey got skin cancer in 2015. Determining the cause of cancer is notoriously difficult, but among the surviving couriers, there’s a growing consensus that their cancers aren’t normal. So Lamey and some others have decided to finally go public about their decades-old concerns, and that includes the mystery of the Savannah River incident. “What,” Lamey asked, “do we have to lose?”













dilbert firestorm's Avatar
trust the CDC? answer is no. unless there is supporting data to support those claims.


theres been said of long term exposure... I remember reading that a studio film crew was out in the nevada desert doing shoots during a nuke bomb test during the 50's or 60's. I think they were near it or close enough to get fallout exposure. a number of them got sick in later years.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Dozens Of Men Got Sick During A Secret Training Exercise At A Nuclear Site In 1991. They're Still Fighting For Answers.


https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article...ng-exercise-at


Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

you bumped a 4 year old thread of yours? "attention whore" is not a good look, son.
eccieuser9500's Avatar


Logistics maintenance and storage of said power. Can you tell me the measurement of radiation for exposure within a forty-mile radius of a specific location after testing? Hydrogen testing in the fifties.



Let me tell you about a vacation spot you must beleive before you see.




A vast nothingness for a radius of what you can only imagine to . . . be . . . forty-something miles? Maybe. What is a mile when you lose all perspective of distance. Tangibly.

I beams. Bent. Nothing but earth. Earth! Dirt. Very little in your line of vision as you rotate 180 degrees. You only need 5 minutes to understand this is what the end of the world looks like.





Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
couldn't you come up with a better name than eccieuser9500??? the mods here can fix it for ya! Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
trust the CDC? answer is no. unless there is supporting data to support those claims.


theres been said of long term exposure... I remember reading that a studio film crew was out in the nevada desert doing shoots during a nuke bomb test during the 50's or 60's. I think they were near it or close enough to get fallout exposure. a number of them got sick in later years. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm












You can't forget the name now!
eccieuser9500's Avatar
you bumped a 4 year old thread of yours? "attention whore" is not a good look, son. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Four years ago, this was funny. Sir.














The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
You can't forget the name now! Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

you've earned the prestigious gloryhole snick quack award



ICU 812's Avatar
Tine has a way of leveling the playing field of political history.

It may take fifty years or more, but eventually historians will do deep research on the elections of 2016 and 2020 with a somewhat less biased eye than is possible for anyone today. Some aspiring PhD will look at the entirety of the Clinton's political record and draw conclusions based on circumstantial evidence that has been dismissed as malicious speculation today. Only time will tell us which conclusions are likely to be valid.

Academics and historians with a narrower focus will look at the 2016 and 2020 elections the same way. Others will look at the pandemic, or the effects of social media as subjects for separate PhD dissertations. By then we will know more about the medical limitations of President Biden as we do about President Reaan.

Would the results have been different if (whatever) had or had not happened?

Only time will tell. I wish I could still be alive to read all about it.
eccieuser9500's Avatar
you've earned the prestigious gloryhole snick quack award


Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

I blame the government for poisoning me. Not really though, since I volunteered.
eccieuser9500's Avatar
Tine has a way of leveling the playing field of political history.

It may take fifty years or more, but eventually historians will do deep research on the elections of 2016 and 2020 with a somewhat less biased eye than is possible for anyone today. Some aspiring PhD will look at the entirety of the Clinton's political record and draw conclusions based on circumstantial evidence that has been dismissed as malicious speculation today. Only time will tell us which conclusions are likely to be valid.

Academics and historians with a narrower focus will look at the 2016 and 2020 elections the same way. Others will look at the pandemic, or the effects of social media as subjects for separate PhD dissertations. By then we will know more about the medical limitations of President Biden as we do about President Reaan.

Would the results have been different if (whatever) had or had not happened?

Only time will tell. I wish I could still be alive to read all about it. Originally Posted by ICU 812

Wrong thread.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
I blame the government for poisoning me. Not really though, since I volunteered. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

socialism poisoned you. seek detox now.
eccieuser9500's Avatar
socialism poisoned you. seek detox now. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Not even a "BAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA"?

Lame.