I know quite a few of these educated Suburban Women, and most are rather conservative and back President Trump.Obviously, East Houston isn't Dallas.
But then, East Houston ain't Austin. Originally Posted by Jackie S
I know quite a few of these educated Suburban Women, and most are rather conservative and back President Trump. Originally Posted by Jackie SIt's sad that folks must make derogatory, stereotypical remarks about any group of people, including females, but I suppose doing so provides a certain level of security, if even based on a false narrative. For years I perceived females with large breasts as being rather "empty headed" until I started "dating" an extraordinarily large breasted (for her trim size) math major working on her master's degree. Extremely intelligent and talented.
East Houston is barely Texas. Originally Posted by Yssup RiderOne can easily say that about 95% of Austin!
One can easily say that about 95% of Austin!
It's just the taxpayers and natural resources have to pay for all the shit that has permeated the State Capital. And if it weren't for the Texas taxpayers and natural resources Austin would be a flashing yellow light with a freeway beside "main street" to avoid having to stop! Originally Posted by LexusLover
According to this link, only two Countries, The Us and Canada, have birthright by means of simply being born on that Coutry's soil.
https://www.quora.com/In-which-count...childs-parents
The others all contain some typ of Caveat that prevents what has come to be called "anchor babies".
I agree that Section One of the 14th Amendment is written in plain enough English to understand that an Executive Ordr will not stand up to judicial scrutiny.
But, it's good politics. Originally Posted by Jackie S
Great Zues!
He can sign an executive order to make pigs fly too.
There's that first sentence in the 14th amendment. Relax.
He's just shitting from his mouth per usual. Originally Posted by grean
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereofmake the 14th, apply to NON-Citizens?
I've always believed in watching other news sources to try, in good faith, to see both sides of an issue. Also, to view what others are soaking in and believing word for word
A conversation needs to get started. Perhaps the younger generation will provide us with some clarity in the future. Think the people of my generation (and older) are the ones who messed everything up.. Originally Posted by ElisabethWhispers
I agree and I live here Originally Posted by Austin EllenI DID also, which is why I left. The "philosophy" is much the same as the "philosophy" of people leaving their country because it's a shit hole and transporting their beliefs and habits to this country where they "yearn" to prosper! They seem to be "at home" in shit holes.
However, the 14th amendment was wrote specifically for the children of Slaves born in the US, to be given citizenship. Add to that, its the whole "SUBJECT to the jurisdiction there of, that should Not cover illegal aliens, as they are still citizens of hteir home country thus subject to that contry's jurisdiction. Not ours.Who within our borders is not subject to the jurisdiction thereof?
That's why for years, i've Argued for getting rid OF birth right citizenship. OR at least making it so to gain it, ONE OF THE PARENTS should be a US citizen..
And how exactly does
make the 14th, apply to NON-Citizens?
Originally Posted by garhkal
He said we were the only country in the world that allows birthright citizenship.If 30 do, then about 165 do not allow birth rite citizenship..
Patently false. Around 30 nations do.
I copied it in bold face letters. Read. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
If 30 do, then about 165 do not allow birth rite citizenship..Great point, ff.
We should at least require new citizens not come from shithole countries, unless they are young and pretty females and agree to work at least 5 years as a stripper or a hooker. Originally Posted by friendly fred