what if the roles were reversed

It wouldn't matter, Ansley. . .aren't I on your infamous DNS list? Originally Posted by ANONONE

Well you know more than I do. I didn't know that I had such a list. Now you are telling me that it is infamous, cool.

Well it is only infamous because I am on it.

.... no one over say 200 lbs. . . . Originally Posted by big boi terry

See? That's my point.... the best of these girls, in order to be well recieved by the hobbiest public at large that make up a rather large percentage..... go thru the motions and present the illusion of passion to even the most hideous of ogres!! Most often.... they don't know what they're dealing with until the door swings open!! They are truly Angels, in my opinion!!

Do we really think we could get it up on a consistent basis, when the door swings open and you find a hairy wildebeest fawning for you?

I ain't gonna lie.... I don't think I could do it!!

Giz

Really? Women tip better than men? I've been both a bartender and a waiter in my younger days, and women are notorious for being poor tippers. Not only that, but a group of women will want separate checks which really slows you down. Maybe young ladies under 25 are better tippers than young guys, but that is usually with someone elses money. ps I would be a horrible provider. Wham bam thank you maam would be my credo.

I'd be very very broke.

For me, here's the deal. I'd do it with several restrictions. First, I'd have to be physically attracted to the lady. As mentioned earlier, for guys performance is directly related to the attraction between partners. If I'm the one being paid to perform, I need to be able to perform in the 1st place. A lady would have to provide pictures of herself and/or be willing for me to leave without performing due to computability issues as determined by me. I know this may sound backwoods and harsh, but there are somethings a guy can't fake. Second, any and all activities would be strictly a YMMV venture. Of course, I'd make this known up front.

WOW good thing we don't have those restrictions

For me, here's the deal. I'd do it with several restrictions. First, I'd have to be physically attracted to the lady. As mentioned earlier, for guys performance is directly related to the attraction between partners. If I'm the one being paid to perform, I need to be able to perform in the 1st place. A lady would have to provide pictures of herself and/or be willing for me to leave without performing due to computability issues as determined by me. I know this may sound backwoods and harsh, but there are somethings a guy can't fake. Second, any and all activities would be strictly a YMMV venture. Of course, I'd make this known up front. Originally Posted by Cpalmson

For me, here's the deal. I'd do it with several restrictions. First, I'd have to be physically attracted to the lady. As mentioned earlier, for guys performance is directly related to the attraction between partners. If I'm the one being paid to perform, I need to be able to perform in the 1st place. A lady would have to provide pictures of herself and/or be willing for me to leave without performing due to computability issues as determined by me. I know this may sound backwoods and harsh, but there are somethings a guy can't fake. Second, any and all activities would be strictly a YMMV venture. Of course, I'd make this known up front. Originally Posted by Cpalmson

What type of reviews would you expect for that level of service?

WOW good thing we don't have those restrictions Originally Posted by Irish Vixen

LOL

I only said what I did out of fairness. I honestly don't think I could take money from anyone and then not be able to deliver. So in order to avoid that awkward situation, I think it is only right on my part to disclose that fact. I've had dates with provider who simply went through motions. I felt completely ripped off, but who am I to complain to? If I'm going to offer my services, I'm not going to go through the motions, so in some way I have to be able to control the situation to ensure not going through the motion. And for me, that means being with someone I'm attracted to. On the flip side, as a client, it is one of my goals to try and let the provider have as much fun as me. Guess I'm a bit old fashioned in this regard, but I digress.

What type of reviews would you expect for that level of service? Originally Posted by MrGiz

Good ones, I'd hope

The whole difference is give a woman a bottle of lube and she ready to go. We have to be a little more excited to work well

i had the chance to be a male escort when i was 20...it was at an interesting time in my life and i already had made some bad choices...so i chose not to.

would i do it today?? no...i couldnt bring myself to sleep with someone i wasnt attracted to. no 'BBDATY' ...from daddy...for just any gal

See? That's my point.... the best of these girls, in order to be well recieved by the hobbiest public at large that make up a rather large percentage..... go thru the motions and present the illusion of passion to even the most hideous of ogres!! Most often.... they don't know what they're dealing with until the door swings open!! They are truly Angels, in my opinion!!

Do we really think we could get it up on a consistent basis, when the door swings open and you find a hairy wildebeest fawning for you?

I ain't gonna lie.... I don't think I could do it!!

Giz Originally Posted by MrGiz

Hmm. I think I like you.

The whole difference is give a woman a bottle of lube and she ready to go. We have to be a little more excited to work well Originally Posted by burkalini

Well, I can't speak for other women, but I can say this: If I'm not adequately aroused before something goes in there, no amount of lube is going to prevent me from being one sore lady!

I would also like to introduce an idea. While it's tempting to go on and on about the risks, unpleasantries, and sometimes extreme stress of being a provider, it always seems to come off as whining. It also allows for the misinterpretation that we don't enjoy what we do!

There was a client I used to see who would annoy me greatly with his attitude about how easy it must be for me. He once asked me what I'm going to do when I don't have this "easy money" anymore. He also, on multiple occasions, said that he wished he could be a provider. The idea I'm introducing is this one: When you suggest to a put-together, business-oriented, professional provider/full time graduate student that what she does is "easy," you're going to come off as a complete idiot.

Hmm. I think I like you.



Well, I can't speak for other women, but I can say this: If I'm not adequately aroused before something goes in there, no amount of lube is going to prevent me from being one sore lady!

I would also like to introduce an idea. While it's tempting to go on and on about the risks, unpleasantries, and sometimes extreme stress of being a provider, it always seems to come off as whining. It also allows for the misinterpretation that we don't enjoy what we do!

There was a client I used to see who would annoy me greatly with his attitude about how easy it must be for me. He once asked me what I'm going to do when I don't have this "easy money" anymore. He also, on multiple occasions, said that he wished he could be a provider. The idea I'm introducing is this one: When you suggest to a put-together, business-oriented, professional provider/full time graduate student that what she does is "easy," you're going to come off as a complete idiot. Originally Posted by China Doll

It does come off as whining. My point was for the physical requirements. Not the enjoyment portion. We would have to be physically ready and you could( not prefer) just use a bottle of lube.

It does come off as whining. My point was for the physical requirements. Not the enjoyment portion. We would have to be physically ready and you could( not prefer) just use a bottle of lube. Originally Posted by burkalini

And my point was that not every woman can get away with just using lube. Sex can be extremely painful for some women when they are not aroused.

I might be wrong, but I think I detect some venom in your post. If this is the case, then please understand that my later point was unrelated to your post. My statement towards you was not meant as a disagreement but rather an alternate perspective.