Mkes Sense to me.
Thank you Sir - a good post!
I would encourage your vote in 2020 for the candidates of your choice.
I didn't vote because of the way the question is worded but I will happily state my position very clearly here.
I support access to healthcare for anyone and everyone. What I don't support is US Taxpayers paying for the healthcare of non-citizens. They should pay for their own healthcare. If they can't afford it, then they should be given emergency medical care only and then deported. I admire those that want to come here to work but there is a legal process they need to go through.
then the way the question was posed in the debates you would vote NO.
I am also not opposed to those here illegally (who are not criminals and can support themselves and their families) being offered a one-time chance to sign up for a work permit that allows them to stay on certain conditions (only because our lack of immigration enforcement essentially invited them to come here illegally) but......they should not be given citizenship unless they go back to their home country and go through the correct legal process to do so. I really don't know why something like this would even be controversial at all. Originally Posted by ICTTDS
I didn't vote because of the way the question is worded but I will happily state my position very clearly here.good post. makes a lot of sense. for some reason the politicians in Washington want it this way or there would have been reform. Reagan even had a policy on immigration in the 80s
I support access to healthcare for anyone and everyone. What I don't support is US Taxpayers paying for the healthcare of non-citizens. They should pay for their own healthcare. If they can't afford it, then they should be given emergency medical care only and then deported. I admire those that want to come here to work but there is a legal process they need to go through.
I am also not opposed to those here illegally (who are not criminals and can support themselves and their families) being offered a one-time chance to sign up for a work permit that allows them to stay on certain conditions (only because our lack of immigration enforcement essentially invited them to come here illegally) but......they should not be given citizenship unless they go back to their home country and go through the correct legal process to do so. I really don't know why something like this would even be controversial at all. Originally Posted by ICTTDS
then let them get it at the first nation they come to. Mexico.Your racist bias shines right through your OP and your response. Asylum seekers don't just travel North on foot. They sometimes washup on our shores. Tsk tsk!
and "i hate my shithole country" isn't a valid reason for asylum. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
Your racist bias shines right through your OP and your response. Asylum seekers don't just travel North on foot. They sometimes washup on our shores. Tsk tsk!
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
good post. makes a lot of sense. for some reason the politicians in Washington want it this way or there would have been reform. Reagan even had a policy on immigration in the 80s Originally Posted by themysticYeah and he regretted it and learned...YOU DON'T TRUST DEMOCRAPS!
right! like the Cuban refugees?Shhhhhhhh don't expose the radical leftwing narrative.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariel_boatlift
Jimmy Carter looked like a fool for that .. not like he needed much help ..
Guatemala elects new president to inherit Trump migration bind
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/guatemala-...060932456.html
Mexican armed forces meets migrants at southern border
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/...order-n1014441
there is nothing RACIST about opposing ILLEGAL immigration. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid