You are under the assumption that MODs work under watchful eyes of others..... no one has the time or desire to watch what someone else is doing and a problem has to become large enough to merit looking before anyone does...
Originally Posted by Whispers
Actively watching every activity of the local Mods would probably create information overload for the numerically fewer Admins and site owners, but the limited capacity for active monitoring doesn't negate the fact that there's oversight for issues when alarms are raised about shady dealings.
"Reform the board along the model I suggest"? It's their board and their model.... I was just explaining what I've seen and come to know about it over the years.... Wouldn't you say there is long term support to the theory that the whores are not of any major concern to those that operate the board?
Originally Posted by Whispers
While the first priority of the board's operations is to insure accountability for provider performance by reviews, feedback & hobbyist discussion, the board's current status and allowance of female participation in most public forums suggests that providers are in fact of concern.. just not to the degree that their desires negate the valid goal of provider accountability.
And what do you have to say about the vast majority that NEVER post or weigh in? I think it tends to suggest their needs are met with what is available so why change anything because a few guys want to make nice with the whores and have someone to talk to of the opposite sex?
Originally Posted by Whispers
I admit I don't know what the lurkers really want. They haven't exactly spoken up, and most lurkers may remain lurkers despite strong personal opinions on how the hobby and this hobby board are run. You and I can only speculate on their motives. One motive for not having an active presence in the forums is due to the fact that this board is monitored, archived & recorded for posterity in areas outside the board owners' jurisdiction. What lurkers say when they unlurk can be used against them in a court of law.
That doesn't negate the lurker's ability and desire to contribute financially to the board by purchasing premium access if he feels a different model (more female participation or less) makes his hobbying experience better.
How exactly does it harm you or other hobbyists to have more equal male+female participation and influence in a limited area while retaining the right to take the gloves off on multiple subforums?