Fox just had a video of one of the four hostages who stated that they waited on the Tarmac for hours waiting for a plane to land.
Hmmmm, I wonder what that plane was?
Lying sacks of shit. The whole Fukin' bunch.
Eat my shorts, dipshit.There was no other mention of the video you're talking about in this thread. The only mention of a video came from Jackie and it had nothing to do with Trump. In fact no one even mentioned trumps name except you. I thought at first you had accidentally posted your remark in the wrong thread until I saw your name next to it.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b056bad214f633
Don't you ever get tired of having your ass handed to you? Keep flailing. You look like Drumpf making fun of the disabled...
STRIKE TWO! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
There was no other mention of the video you're talking about in this thread. The only mention of a video came from Jackie and it had nothing to do with Trump. In fact no one even mentioned trumps name except you. I thought at first you had accidentally posted your remark in the wrong thread until I saw your name next to it.y-rider gets his ass kicked!
When you post...try having a point. It makes it so much more interesting to the reader.
Strike Three.. Your out. Originally Posted by TheDaliLama
Drumpf's own staff says there was no such video.Whether or not there was a video, Obama sent $400 million to Iran in cash, small unmarked bills, to Iran as a ransom for hostages which Obama claims is a partial payment to Iran on a debt we don't even owe.
SWING AND A MISS! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Whether or not there was a video, Obama sent $400 million to Iran in cash, small unmarked bills, to Iran as a ransom for hostages which Obama claims is a partial payment to Iran on a debt we don't even owe. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuyAnd at least one of the kidnap victims is reporting they had to wait until the money got there!!!!
7665410584[/FONT]]No this was money laundering despite the legal expertise of Munchkin. Sometimes money laundering does hide the source of the money but sometimes money laundering just make the money "clean". It is illegal to do business with Iran with US dollars so you have to get rid of those dollars and money is fungible. The earlier money we sent to the Iranians can be tracked through the Internet (so why didn't we do that this time?) but this cash can be divided into neat bundles literally and Everyone knows if it's not neatly bundled the terrorists can't spend it.given to terrorists for operations in England, France, Germany, Israel, Belgium, and the US. It probably was. So now, Obama is sponsoring terrorism against our allies. Again, why an unmarked plane? Reagan released obsolete parts to the Iranians in exchange for money and hostages. The money went to the Contras (since the unconstitutional Boland bill would not allow Reagan to do foreign policy) and we got hostages back. Reagan admitted as much. This time Obama went further, we didn't give Iran obsolete weapons, we gave them money to be used for buying new weapons and paying for operations in Europe. It was against the law and Congress had no chance to approve or disapprove (ala the Boland Bill).You go from "It probably was." to Obama sponsoring terrorism against our allies to sliding up America's ass with a version or Iran-Contra so laundered any American would have been proud to be a part of it.
So if this was so up and up, why the secrecy? I watched Josh Ernest the other day. He must have said the word "ransom" 12 times in two minutes as he denied that it was ransom. Shakespeare had him pegged. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn;[FONT=Arial