It's cute that you try to come to the defense of your fellow leftist when he makes absurd, false statements
Sadly, you failed just like he did
Your first article makes no mention of any gun confiscated. I guess you don't understand the concept of stock images
Your second article does not claim the guns were confiscated due to the bump stock rule which is what your fellow leftist claimed. It states that they were seized from 3 people who were listed in the Armed Prohibited Persons System database or were suspected of engaging in illegally acquiring or possessing illicit weapons. Meaning these guns were seized because these 3 convicted criminals were not permitted to own any guns - not because of anything to do with the bump stock ban
You should try better reading comprehension if you want to answer the question
Originally Posted by berryberry
Open up the photo and look at the meta-data. Then prove it's a stock pic. Your word isn't currency here. They state its a seized gun. It's got a bump stock. This one's the beef.
As for the second one, dem guns were seized. Period. This is the gravy.
Non-zero confirmed. I get that you can't deal with it, but it is what it is.
If you want the cherry, I've been sandbagging you. Ajay Dhingra had his bump stock rifle seized in 2019. It made national news as the first federal case. He was arraigned before U.S. District Judge Gray Miller.
He fucked around and found out.