L.A., it seems that people want to comprehend and see what they want to see.....
Let me slow this down for those with a minimal ability to comprehend.....
Reviews are subjective....what one reviewer may find as sexy, another reviewer may not therefore I give "THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT" regarding the review and I'll take a plunge to find out for myself.
I am aware that some hobbyist will write a bad review about a provider because he has an ax to grind with her and I'm aware that providers will do the same (ex. the video going around putting clients on blast) BUT I don't make my decisions solely on reviews by hobbyist, I'll give "THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT" to the provider and find out on my own.
The problem that so many seem to have difficulties grasping is, embellishing the encounter, appearance, or experience. If the provider is BBW with bad teeth, just say that.....don't describe her as slim with a perfect smile. If they disclose the imperfections, I then decide to go and have no disappointments in expecting something that is a misrepresentation.
The point of the thread is not to call the provider out because if you recall, the entire first post was referencing the hobbyist who isn't fully forthcoming with the encounter. So me posting who the provider is, is not the point because the provider didn't post the review, it is the hobbyist who aren't forth coming.....that's what you seem to fail to grasp just like others who take meaning out of the post that has clearly nothing to do with the point.
You follow me?
What I have seen thus far from the discussion is a pack mentality...the "For's and the Against" and rather than take the point for what its worth, it is taken totally out of context and made into something that it wasn't intended.
Like someone claiming it is bashing the provider when the provider isn't called out by name.
Oh boy!
OP you may disagree with this statement but it's the truth.
Originally Posted by L.A.