...a lesser process would suffice such as a testimonial or verification/validation process with basic details. I believe the providers often feel like they are placed on trial with each review they receive.
Originally Posted by msguru
Agreed in general. I don't need to read trial-evidence-level details such as she had stubble that day or made the right sounds for that guy. That's too picky and a woman hardly knows which way to fix it, because no woman is going to be perfect in every way for every guy, every time.
But in one sense, every session
is a personalized trial like a one-off special event. In this sense, that's the opposite of a mass operation like Brake Check where the value is reported over a month's or a year's business trend among many customers, the accumulation of many Yelp reviews, etc.
So when I see a No, I'd like to read more to find out why, which also informs me about the guy's judgment and expectations so I can take that into account.