... how many times over the years have you heard something reported and drawn a conclusion from the initial disclosure, but later on after a more complete investigation the facts as originally reported are modified, clarified, and/or recanted and replaced with the correct information?
That's the danger of releasing information to the press ....
... and worse yet, leaks, which are usually partial, incomplete, and tainted!
The person standing up there answering questions is repeating what he was told (as he recalls it) ... I've seen the Sheriff ask someone off camera several times about specifics and passes on answering the question. Again, there have been numerous caveats! I'm not saying it's the case here: but they will release false information and wait for it to come back to them from a source with whom they are interacting ... and they will not mention key elements so that fake sources can't know those elements so they can verify if someone knows what the fuck they are talking about to them ....
.. this investigation is still ongoing and sounds international in scope. Originally Posted by LexusLover
I have never seen the time line of a shooting change so radically as reported by the police themselves at press conferences over a weeks time. They went into detail with charts describing how Jesus the security guard stopped the mass shooting, about a week later the same people report just the opposite, that now he was the first person shot.
That is a MAJOR detail that is easily cleared up by simply asking Jesus himself. This information came from the sheriff with the FBI standing next to him at press conferences, not the media. This stands out like a broken arm.
