My opinion was that as a jurist, you better be damn sure that the defendant is guilty. You better not rely on some crooked DA...but science based verifiable evidence.
Now settle the fuck down before you pop a blood vessel.
That is my view on the death penalty....my view basically is that you better be able to bey your life, that the defendant is guilty.
Was that to hard to figure out for you?
Originally Posted by WTF
If you have ever been on a jury...you rule on the evidence presented to you...the jury doesn't know if the prosecution is crooked!!
Next time I'm on a jury I'll be sure to ask the prosecution if they are crooked...Gotcha!!
There is a LOT of criteria that has to be meet in order for a death sentence to be imposed!!
Is that hard for you to figure out...
P.S. It is beyond a reasonable doubt...maybe they should give each juror a crystal ball...so they can bet their life!!