Strongly agree with the ex-NYer on this one.Yeah, I think this is generally historically true as well in monarchies. Oftentimes, you get a strong ruler starting off well but then his kids have to come in and fuck it all up.
Nepotism works out poorly much more often than not. Same thing in the business world. Clients of ours were occasionally small companies where an SMU frat boy took the reins of daddy's company. Others who were in many cases smarter or better qualified got squeezed out and became resentful. Good way to fuck up a company.
Looks like people get pissed off easily on this site, so hope I don't offend anybody with the following!
I thought Daddy Bush was a decent man who always wanted to do what was right and was perhaps a better president than most, or at least many. But W was sort of like a spoiled frat boy who never grew up. He just had no business being president. Originally Posted by WWII NavyVet
Bush Sr. did what was best for the country and compromised to get things done and it got him booted from office for it, unfortunately. I would say that while W is was indeed like the spoiled frat boy, I don't think he (or really any president) is actively malicious (as much as the right would love to demonize Obama). Everybody who takes that office believes what they're doing is for the good of the country. Now whether or not the results actually turn out to be true is another thing entirely...