It is so cute that you think my post was about YOU.. It wasn't, and let me show you how.What did Amber have for breakfast this morning?
1. I wrote about your hypocritical advice to MissBlue. You told her not to respond to every thread or look desperate, yet you do that daily.
2.8 times per day actually. 71% of your posts for the last 3 months are in Dallas ISO.
Not desperate? LMFAO. I presented facts and showed that you aren't one to be giving advice..
I'm not "stalking" you. I read a post that seemed bogus, did my research so that I'm not talking out my ass, and posted the results.
2. There is no 2... I Just like typing, so I decided I would fluff it here. Maybe I should talk about unicorns and fireflies... I really like fireflies. Especially like when a million of them are eaten by a pterodactyl... hugging his bowels like a million hugs...
3. I provided my opinion about that the OP asked. I think it should be a PM only type of situation for the ladies. That is what really kept my post on track... so claim hijacking all you want. It is plainly not true.
We obviously have two very different definitions of what "successful" is 'round these parts.... Originally Posted by ~Ze~
is your final dicision on a provider that has responded to your ISO based on rates and location, or who truly meets what you put the ISO up for? dose the way a provider responds make a diffrence, pm or quick reply. do you just want to hear im avalible at such and such area or do you want the provider to try to "sell"herself and tell you why she would be the best pick? just some questiond running through my head. i respond to ISOs regularly and was just wondering if the way we respond or what we say has anything to do with you guys decision on who your going to pick. Originally Posted by missblue
And also, don't look so deperate by posting ON EVERY SINGLE ISO out there. ONLY post on the one's that are actually on your menu. Originally Posted by Amber Rain"Actually on your menu" is not much of a limitation in practice, though, since
90% of the people who post in the ISO forum don't give specifics Originally Posted by jimballs12So most ladies could justify posting, just because, "hey, I provide GFE and am located in the DFW area!" It may not be every single ISO but it'll be pretty close.
I'd like to think that if us guys did a better job of saying what we want that you wouldn't get as many bs replies. Originally Posted by jimballs12but since that isn't going to happen, next best is
My advice is that if you are going to use ISO.. do your homework. There was a thread not too long ago where a gent was "seeking his new ATF". A quick review of his posting history and review history would suggest that he preferred the younger, fit type. But most of the replies to his request were nowhere in the same league as what his history would indicate. A few extra minutes of reading will not only allow you to avoid wasting time replying to gents that you wouldn't be compatible with.. but it will also enable you to tailor a response more likely to catch his attention, if you simply pay a little attention to his board personality. Originally Posted by GracePrestonCarpet bombing replies in ISO is sort of the mirror image of gents who call or email a new lady without doing any research (e.g., check showcase and/or website). The latter irritates the ladies, and the former irritates the gents. If you don't want them to do it to you, don't do it them either.
Amber,Grace,little miss, Your highness Ze. Where in this post does the Op ask for your input. It is directed to the gents of ECCIE. People wonder why this place is going downhill. This is a perfect example of why. Your highness Ze if you want to make thread to bash Ambet go and start your own. No reason to hijack this one and get your followers to pile on. Take it somewhere else. And let's not forget Fawn. Thought you were a MOD ?? Why did you have to jump on the dogpile instead of helping to diffuse or redirect this thread?? Just MY opinion but I thought that was what MODS were supposed to be doing. But I guess I'm mistaken. Now to answer the OP's questions. Yes some gals here do get a bad rep with guys because they are constantly answering ISO's that do NOT pertain to them. IE LOoking for BBBJ in FTW and the same 3 or 4 Dallas lady's will respond " I'm available". The point is if an ISO is posted is better to only respond if you meet all requirements the OP is looking for. When the same girls respond to ALL ISO's it only makes them look desperate. And also tends to make the forum as a whole a waste of time and space. Originally Posted by Texasquest
Amber,Grace,little miss, Your highness Ze. Where in this post does the Op ask for your input. It is directed to the gents of ECCIE. People wonder why this place is going downhill. This is a perfect example of why. Your highness Ze if you want to make thread to bash Ambet go and start your own. No reason to hijack this one and get your followers to pile on. Take it somewhere else. And let's not forget Fawn. Thought you were a MOD ?? Why did you have to jump on the dogpile instead of helping to diffuse or redirect this thread?? Just MY opinion but I thought that was what MODS were supposed to be doing. But I guess I'm mistaken. Now to answer the OP's questions. Yes some gals here do get a bad rep with guys because they are constantly answering ISO's that do NOT pertain to them. IE LOoking for BBBJ in FTW and the same 3 or 4 Dallas lady's will respond " I'm available". The point is if an ISO is posted is better to only respond if you meet all requirements the OP is looking for. When the same girls respond to ALL ISO's it only makes them look desperate. And also tends to make the forum as a whole a waste of time and space. Originally Posted by TexasquestYes, I am a female mod over the PR only so I have no control over what happens in COED so if you dont like what you see or read hit the RTM button so the MALE MODS over this section can control the situation...
Just because I am a provider does not mean that I am not also a hobbyist. On more than one occasion, I have used posts in the ISO to seek out ladies for my own pleasure, and to add to a session that I am already booked for. It works quite nicely actually. Ive always found what I was looking for by reading through the posts and paying attention to
others responses. I skip the PICK ME, PICK ME girls. When she said "you guys" that to me means anyone who uses it, and since this is a CoEd thread, I can post whatever I'd like. But thank you anyways Sir! Originally Posted by LittleMiss
And I dont see me saying ouch is adding to the dog pile because it was not directed at either lady it was just a comment...Why did you post it then if it was not directed at anyone and you just posted it for the hell of posting something...why waste your time and end up looking like part of the problem vs part of the solution? Such as maybe posting..."I don't see why certain people have turned this thread into an attack on Amber instead of helping Miss Blue with her original request ..." But then again, what do I know... Personally, I totally agree with Texasquest. Crap like this where people take out vendettas against each other is leaving a foul taste in my mouth. It defeats the ultimate purpose of this board which is to have fun and stay safe.
This is why I rarely post anymore.... Originally Posted by fawn
[Texasquest... I think I just fell in lust with you.
Unless you have some "equipment" the rest of us don't know about. When the OP says "you guys" most assume that she meant the people that have something hanging between their legs. But if the shoe fits?? Also you not only see the PICK ME PICK ME gals in ISO. Threads like this one also seem to bring out the KEYBOARD WARRIORS as well. Little Miss the OP asked how the guys made their decisions. Not how you Lady's felt about Amber. Now that you have been called to task now your trying to hide behind a "part time hobbiest" persona. That awfully weak in a lot of people's eyes. Jus sayin Originally Posted by Texasquest
Yes, I am a female mod over the PR only so I have no control over what happens in COED so if you dont like what you see or read hit the RTM button so the MALE MODS over this section can control the situation...
And I dont see me saying ouch is adding to the dog pile because it was not directed at either lady it was just a statement...
This is why I rarely post anymore.... Originally Posted by fawn
Amber,Grace,little miss, Your highness Ze. Where in this post does the Op ask for your input. It is directed to the gents of ECCIE. People wonder why this place is going downhill. This is a perfect example of why. Your highness Ze if you want to make thread to bash Ambet go and start your own. No reason to hijack this one and get your followers to pile on. Take it somewhere else. And let's not forget Fawn. Thought you were a MOD ?? Why did you have to jump on the dogpile instead of helping to diffuse or redirect this thread?? Just MY opinion but I thought that was what MODS were supposed to be doing. But I guess I'm mistaken. Now to answer the OP's questions. Yes some gals here do get a bad rep with guys because they are constantly answering ISO's that do NOT pertain to them. IE LOoking for BBBJ in FTW and the same 3 or 4 Dallas lady's will respond " I'm available". The point is if an ISO is posted is better to only respond if you meet all requirements the OP is looking for. When the same girls respond to ALL ISO's it only makes them look desperate. And also tends to make the forum as a whole a waste of time and space. Originally Posted by Texasquest