Oath Keepers

lostincypress's Avatar
It is Article 1 Section 8 ................not 2.

And the reality of your hypothetical would have so many constitutional issues swirling around that it is impossible to say what the prevailing facts would be in (legal or illegal) order to put down said "insurrection."

It would have to work it's way thru the courts and SCOTUS before anyone can say such an order would be legal and constitutional. Are you psychic to know how some unknown SCOTUS would rule ? Originally Posted by Whirlaway
At that point I don't think anyone would give a shit what 9 people in robes had to say.
All good now. and i won't bill you either. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
Thanks, There is this other matter, though...LOL
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Thanks, There is this other matter, though...LOL Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
well come now sport. spill the beans! inquiring hooktards want to know!
well come now sport. spill the beans! inquiring hooktards want to know! Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
I'm good but our brothers will need you when the Jack Boots show up.
You are probably right.



At that point I don't think anyone would give a shit what 9 people in robes had to say. Originally Posted by lostincypress
I'm good Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
Not according to Hanoi COG. He says his ATF IIFFY's "Sweet Ass" is "Sweet."

His words, not mine!