I know what it says, dude. And that ALL it says. No mention of firearms. No mention of any of that shit you guys claim.
Apparently I’m not who sucks at this.
How much S has to hit the F for you to have enough ordinance on hand? Originally Posted by Yssup RiderPoor grammar aside, I don’t know what you’re asking here. Is it when would you start shooting, or what do you (I) feel is enough ammo to survive something along the lines of a protracted power grid failure?
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Do you suck at this on purpose? So, at least you agree it is not a Rod N Reel or Hunt club provision as there is no mention of woodland creatures. Yet there is contained within that very Amendment the word - Militia.
Militia
noun
(Hat tip
- a body of citizens enrolled for military service, and called out periodically for drill but serving full time only in emergencies.
- a body of citizen soldiers as distinguished from professional soldiers.
- all able-bodied males considered by law eligible for military service.
- a body of citizens organized in a paramilitary group and typically regarding themselves as defenders of individual rights against the presumed interference of the federal government.
to dictionary.com)
From Federalist 46:
...Let a regular army, fully equal to the resources of the country, be formed; and let it be entirely at the devotion of the federal government; still it would not be going too far to say, that the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger...
I rather doubt Madison envisioned the citizenry repelling the regular federal army with fishing poles. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do
Yet you clearly do not know what it means, why it is there or even the general purpose of it, let alone why it is the most unique clause in the free world. Now, I'm not saying you can't comprehend that... Wait! Why_Yes_I_Am. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Dohe has a reading comprehension problem. there are 3 words associated with weapons of war
Somehow I doubt that unless you're using a rifle capable of taking down an elephant. Or are you using illegal Kevlar coated ammo?I think you might be referring to Teflon Coated Ammo. Kevlar is the material Body Armor is made of.
But then again some folks only equate the title to assault weapon to an M-60 Originally Posted by chefnerd
...300 black is far superior. The real advantage of 556 is that it’ll be easy to find in a SHTF scenario. Originally Posted by JacuzzmeGranted, 300 blackout is a mighty fine round. What is your take on the new Sig round that the military recently started to adopt for Sig's new rifle? I understand it to be a 2 stage round?? (My Sig-nerd hasn't been around in awhile to ask)
Granted, 300 blackout is a mighty fine round. What is your take on the new Sig round that the military recently started to adopt for Sig's new rifle? I understand it to be a 2 stage round?? (My Sig-nerd hasn't been around in awhile to ask) Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_DoThere are many videos on that. This one seems to be ballanced and reasonably presented.
There are many videos on that. This one seems to be ballanced and reasonably presented.Well... I would want to use whatever round the French use as there should be plenty of those on the ground in a WWIII ground war scenario...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTZRCEh1Czg... Originally Posted by ICU 812