Provider Posting Client Reviews-Ladies Paid Area?

Here are some other blacklist sites that I've found :

http://www.blacklistedjohn.com
http://blacklistednow.blogspot.com

They should install a rep counter or something so when you have a good time with one of the great women they can give you the up or down. Of course this need to be seen by the woman only as it may destroy some guys little ego:P
I am pretty noob so there may be something like that?

The inherent problem of review sites for both men and women is it really is a HE said SHE said

Guy does not have a stellar time, posts a MEH review.. lady gets mad because all her others are great... A lot of factors need to be considered.

Posting about guys should not be on their "performance" but more like "he is cool, easy to get along with" or "the man can DATY for hours" or as stated earlier, "in Mish it seems he is drilling for oil"

Keep in mind that saying a guy gets wild in a specific position can be tricky.. that MIGHT be how he gets off so if someone says "he goes nuts in K9" may seem like a warning and future ladies might not want to do K9 with him, that might be the only way to get him off.

Sharing personal info I am leary of but could see where a handle contacts a lady on ###-###-#### and another lady on a different # that can send up cautions.

And if the guy is an asshole or worse (L.E.) By all means share everything you have..

I would not mind getting reviewed by a provider IF she told me what she liked beforehand and pay me an hourly rate. That is what I do as I do not expect her to be a mind reader, neither should she.

Im in

Please be aware I have a "no review" policy. I do this as a matter of personal choice, and to protect my privacy and the well-being of those close to me. As a matter of course I believe the intimate details of what transpires between us should remain private. If I discover you posted a review of our time together, I will ask you once to remove it, and will refuse future appointments with you. If the review is not removed within two days I will place your name on the national blacklist. -LOL!!!

Too funny - Really! So...the OP wants this new client review room (over and above the powder room, provider buzz, the national blacklists, and whatever else is already out there) BECAUSE she can't get providers to reply to reference requests. Damn! So now you're expecting them to actually write a review?!

we are not allowed to see all of your reviews why should you be allowed to see all of ours ?

I know of a board that does allow this. I believe it's the same one Tia posted about.

As a client, I think it's a great idea too. I would suggest a Sticky Thread - "Clients" in the Powder Room. Make a post with the clients handle and any comments, Stars, Asterisks, Great Daty, Com Si Com Sa, Pure Gentleman or whatever . Doesn't have to be a review, memos like "not very personable" or "tries to bicker on price" etc., as long as it's not to bash a client. Do that in the general forums so at least he has an opportunity to defend himself. This would help in the reference department considerably. Provider can do a search by handle.

Just my .02

(I'd give my left nut to see what was written about me)

I think this may backfire on some. Even if it was with a rest of the story not scene by the clients the reviews would be attached to our handle and the recommendations would be as well. A provider who takes the time to write reviews may lose a client because the number of clients she sees will no longer be a mystery. Just like if you pull up to the I call and see the last guy leave, knowing that you were just number 4 on the day would take away the plausible deniability.

I for one would be less likely to see a provider who does a lot of client reviews.

I AM IN TOO............ its a good idea, plus we can keep taps on the clients that are no good for providers.

shouldn't a provider check references before seeing a guy? isn't that pretty much the same thing as what is being proposed here. otherwise whats the point of guys paying for P411 and getting OK's ?

Miss Dreams, then you wouldn't have to review, like I said, it can be a paid service the ladies who wanted to participate, could. How wouldn't it be safe for clients? Only the information on handles would be used. This is not at all being the opposite of discrete, it's being well informed and educated on who you're agreeing to sleep with. We put our lives in the hands of these men.

The powder room only helps with problem clients or negative reports. This would e much more detailed, and provide an insider look at what the gent is like.

I think it would lead to much more satisfying encounters, since the girls could get prepared for exactly what he likes. Originally Posted by Calista_Syn

Would I have to also put the rubber on and guide it in for you too?

I've been reviewed a few times here on ECCIE. I believe that I'd I would opt-out of being reviewed any longer
for the simple fact that after each one of the new reviews were posted, chicks kept blowing-up my pm box. Heh!


First and foremost; I thinck that if you are going to be a "client-reviewing provider", then you must
let your prospective client know this *well before* setting an appointment
so that they may take this into consideration and make their decision accordingly.
Doing so or mentioning this after booking/meeting is a possible waste of time/absolutely wrong.




You said that "Preferred 411 okays aren't a good enough indicator"..

Okay. maybe not at face value, but, if the guy's number of okays,
(let's say they're in the mid-upper double digits), isn't enough to convince you
that he's *probably* alright, couldn't you simply contact some of those
providers who have given the okays and ask them directly about that client and
the particulars regarding their encounter?

Wouldn't that give you a better idea and isn't that precisely what you are
hoping to get out of this review forum?

Sure, it's more effort, but if you're that concerned...?
..I'm just saying.



-If this review section is being done for "provider's safety", as you're
claiming, I don't see how this review forum could really help in that regard.


- If a provider is too busy, (or too lazy?) to respond to a reference request,
what are the chances that she'd post a review?

-If the guy was a total dickhole, wouldn't this information make it to the
Alert/Info-share areas? (if not already then anyway)

-How far back would you gauge a client's reviews?
Would the information in a review posted over a year ago still be all that
valuable to you?

--Speaking of valuable information,..

How could these reviews be all that valuable? I tend to have different
requests with different providers.

-Lets say, for example, that I'm in the mood for a GFE encounter, I meet the
provider and we do our thing and she posts a favorable review. The next time,
let's say I'm meeting with a PSE-variety provider, and the kink-factor has
been raised exponentially, and it's a (client)Dom/(provider)Sub, BDSM, multi-
partner encounter ...again, with a favorable review.


How can the information from those two meetings be any more valuable than a
direct message from those providers? I mean, the two encounters were vastly
different--from activities, to attitude/behavior, and on and on..--, with
exception of respecting limits and staying within boundaries=--everything
else is just completely different.

I tend to do different things with different providers.

Some providers are okay with certain things/activities while others aren't.
So I can easily see where these reviews could be misconstrued and used
against a client in a couple of ways..


For example, If you were to read a review where after administering a severe
and proper caning to a transvestite, who was sitting in the corner
masterbating to midget twins who had just finished a spirited sex-by-numbers
oral-fest/going down on each other and were gearing-up to do destroy her ass
with a dildo which was almost as big as they were, while I was fisting one
provider and pouring hot, candle wax on another providers starfish, and
simultaneously coming to release into the mouth of another provider, who then
proceeded to snowball it with the others....

...that *might* shock a few of the vanilla/CBJ/non-GFE variety providers,
wouldn't you thinck? How likely do you thinck one of these types would be
to meet with me after reading that filth and carnage?

Now while these providers were totally cool with each and everything that
happened...and while we all may have had the best time in our sexual lives
during this encounter, you have got to be honest and admit that this might
concern a few of you ladies, wouldn't it?

In this case, a "good" review could come back to bite a client in the ass.

****and the above NEVER did happen, it was merely a completely fabricated
story to illustrate a point. Period!****

-Also, some of the clients and providers get along better with some than
others..sometimes the two just fire on all cylinders and things just 'click'..
..and yes, sometimes feelers start to blossom...not saying that it's right, I'm
just saying that it has happened..and it will continue to happen long after
we're gone.

...what happens when the insecure provider goes back through this dude's
reviews and reads what sort of shenanigan's he's gotten into and with whom?

Do you thinck that she might mention these activities to him sometime in the not-so-distant-future?
(read: by the time you've finished reading this
sentence he's already gotten a belly-full from her . Heh!).


Again, I'm not saying that it's right, I am saying that it has happened and it
will continue to happen....but this is another instance where a guy's reviews
can come back and bite him in the ass.


---With regard to those 'blacklist sites'.

I would be very careful using that information to screen a potential client.
NOT because some of the guys on there don't deserve to be listed; (because
some of them most certainly do); rather, there are a LOT of guys listed who
DON'T deserve to be on there.

Specifically; there was a provider from Houston, Tx who would place alerts on
guys for things they said in a post, or some other ridiculous reason or
another...reasons, mind you, that failed miserably as far as meeting the
"Alert/Blacklist" criteria....but they've been blacklisted and that provider
never had any direct interaction with these guys....just didn't care for what
they said in something they posted. In so doing, this provider pretty-much
killed the usefulness of those sites with her bullshit alerts, because she diluted
the quality of information... THAT'S why I suggest that you take the provider
who posted that "alert" or blackist posting into consideration (especially in
the Hou. area), and take her alerts with a Texas-sized grain of salt, because
it's highly likely that it came from the provider I'm talking about.


Finally, I guess that the biggest argument that you're going to receive is that
while I understand that you ladies should do everything in your power to keep
safe, we are the clients. We are the ones who are handing over the several
hundred Dollars/hr...and with that envelope comes a few expectations....one
of which is discretion. It is expected from both sides. If a client is against
being reviewed, then you're out of luck.
We're already giving you the screening information you're requesting,
anything more just seems to be a bit intrusive.

I don't know. I'm afraid that more harm than good
will come from this area and that the majority of clients will be vehemently
against being reviewed which will only result in a failed forum dotted with
sparce and infrequent reviews.

Just my two copperheads..

Kindest regards,
SofaKingFun

.

.

I'm all for it...that way I can pay to see what you say about us like you pay to see our private areas...