Seriously, People Voted For This Moron?

Would you please explain this colloquialism. It is new to me. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I think I have got it right.

Every girl needs a little black dress. So if the fashion one year is for red, you say 'red is the new black'.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_new_black

Well, we can argue about who is most stupid till the cows come home, who is the stupid one, the one in the fiat or the blind one in the truck who can;t keep lane discipline? if you are going to use Latin, at least spell it correctly. It is ad hominem. The fact that you can't spell it shows that anything you ever have or ever will say is worthless.

. Originally Posted by essence

This is a very stupid statement.

FYI: This is how you spell wouldn't not wouldn;t.

I think I have got it right.

Every girl needs a little black dress. So if the fashion one year is for red, you say 'red is the new black'.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_new_black Originally Posted by essence

Thanks.

Well, there you go. "Truth" hinges on double checking the spell checker. Very consistent with the quality of argument presented by the left, form over substance.

Barbara Boxer has to be the stupidest person ever to hold elective office. The Keystone Pipeline will kill - not 8000 people - not 9000 people - but EXACTLY 8100 people! Never mind the thousands of jobs it will create, and the money it will inject into the economy. Nope, it will KILL! So, Canada has decided to give the contract to China, and their people die instead, while they get all the Canadian oil that could have come here. Brilliant!

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...christmas.html

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Talk about stupid. A pipeline to China? As in digging a hole all the way to?

Once again. For you slow ones.

A $50 (an example of well-head price) barrel of oil sitting in the middle of Alberta. Canada will sell to whoever pays. China will not buy that oil because it is much cheaper to get it from the Persian Gulf or Russia. Because of transport costs.

Do you think there will be a pipeline from Alberta to the Pacific? How soon? What cost?

I can’t believe you find time to dig up shit but no time to check the accuracy or the logistics.

Actually, stupid is being in a Fiat that is hit by the big truck going around the corner. That isn't blind, that's something I've seen and wish I hadn't. If you feel that you have to defend the European way of life, go ahead, but ad hominem attacks aren't arguments (well, maybe they are in Europe). Originally Posted by Iaintliein

fixed that!

whoops, I didn't read further down, looks like someone else corrected.

Talk about stupid. A pipeline to China? As in digging a hole all the way to?

Once again. For you slow ones.

A $50 (an example of well-head price) barrel of oil sitting in the middle of Alberta. Canada will sell to whoever pays. China will not buy that oil because it is much cheaper to get it from the Persian Gulf or Russia. Because of transport costs.

Do you think there will be a pipeline from Alberta to the Pacific? How soon? What cost?

I can’t believe you find time to dig up shit but no time to check the accuracy or the logistics. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Do you ever think before you talk? The pipeline shipping oil to China is EXACTLY what will happen. The Prime Minister of Canada has threatened that to Obama.

For once, know what you are talking about before you post. It will be different for you, but you might like.it.

http://nation.foxnews.com/keystone-o...adas-oil-china

http://boudicabpi.wordpress.com/2011...line-decision/

As technology increases, drilling in deeper and deeper water will become common. The Chinese know how much oil is off of our Coast. They wil be out there with their own rigs, drilling for our oil. while we sit back and chase job killing pie in the sky schemes that do little but fatten Democrat Donor's pocket books.,

Stupid bastard, Munch. The pipeline will go to Vancouver, and then be shipped to China. The important thing, that you choose to overlook, is that by turning down the pipeline here, we are losing at least 20,000 jobs and billions of dollars, and roughly 30 years of guaranteed work in Houston. But go ahead and focus on my shorthand, it will prevent you from addressing the real issue. And the real issue is that our President does not have the best interests of America at heart.

This is a very stupid statement.

FYI: This is how you spell wouldn't not wouldn;t. Originally Posted by Budman

Budman, it seems my joke flew over your head. Or maybe you are not used to self abuse.

Increased gasoline use means increased deaths from pollution. Period. That is not in dispute. Originally Posted by TexTushHog

In YOUR world that is not in dispute.

Then we should have no gasoline, and everyone would live!

As technology increases, drilling in deeper and deeper water will become common. The Chinese know how much oil is off of our Coast. They wil be out there with their own rigs, drilling for our oil. while we sit back and chase job killing pie in the sky schemes that do little but fatten Democrat Donor's pocket books., Originally Posted by Jackie S

The Chinese will be able to steal our oil by drilling off the coast of Cuba with directional drilling.

Obama will probably be delighted.

The Chinese will be able to steal our oil by drilling off the coast of Cuba with directional drilling.

Obama will probably be delighted. Originally Posted by joe bloe

Yeah, or maybe they'll dig a tunnel through the earth till right under Houston.

Idiot

Wave, you continue to be an idiot. Do you ever check anything out before you respond?

http://www.americanfreepress.net/htm..._drilling.html