Terminological inexactitudes and Wakeup

OP: I will give you that he "distorted," her statement to create a butterfly effect that would eventually lead to the here and now with your name in his mouth and his dick in his hand.

Wakeup, how many times have we fapped so far???

I sure do love terminological inexactitudes.

OP: I will give you that he "distorted," her statement to create a butterfly effect that would eventually lead to the here and now with your name in his mouth and his dick in his hand.

Wakeup, how many times have we fapped so far??? Originally Posted by YummyMarie

Thank you, at last some sense.

I will take 'distorted' to mean 'inverted into the opposite'

We'll take him.
Originally Posted by chicagoboy

We Brits do love us some US pussy.

So, Churchill is AMerican, not British??????????????????????? ????????? Originally Posted by Pistolero

This whole fuckin' thread is moot because, as errrybody knows, Obama rendered Winnie an unperson. Along with Andy Jackson, Bobby Lee, Stonewall, John Wayne, Gen. Mattis, Jeff Davis, and John Paul II. He's channeling his inner Stalin.

This whole fuckin' thread is moot because, as errrybody knows, Obama rendered Winnie an unperson. Along with Andy Jackson, Bobby Lee, Stonewall, John Wayne, Gen. Mattis, Jeff Davis, and John Paul II. He's channeling his inner Stalin. Originally Posted by Don T. Lukbak

Another liar. Are you talking about Winnie's bust? To clear up that lie:

The bust in question, by British sculptor Jacob Epstein, was given to President George W Bush by the British government in 2001 and was placed in the Oval Office. But the statue was not donated, it was simply on loan for Bush’s term in office (a loan which the British government decided to extend when Bush was re-elected in 2004). Churchill disappeared from the White House in 2009, when the loan ended at the same time that Obama moved in.

So how was the White House able to claim in 2012 that the bust was still there? When writing the blogpost, the then communications director Dan Pfeiffer simply neglected to mention the fact that there are two Churchill busts – the one on loan to Bush from 2001 to 2009, and a second bust which the White House has had since the 1960s and still has to this day – a fact which Pfeiffer later had to clarify in an update at the end of the post.

Boris Johnson is wrong to claim that the vanishing Churchill bust symbolizes Obama’s antipathy towards Britain – it was never Obama’s statue to give away. But the White House’s initial claim that the bust was still in the Oval Office was also a convenient spin on the facts.

The Guardian’s David Smith made a confirmed sighting of the other bust – the one given to George W Bush, when he interviewed the outgoing British ambassador in December last year. Sir Peter Westmacott said the bust was only ever on loan as a personal gift from Tony Blair to George W Bush for the duration of his presidency.

“So, to be honest, we always expected that to leave the Oval Office just like everything else that a president has tends to be changed.”

Speaking at his joint press conference with David Cameron in London, President Obama confirmed that there was a bust of Churchill in the White House residence outside of his office, which he saw every day. “I love Churchill,” he said, before describing the lack of space and risk of “clutter” in the Oval Office.

As the first African-American president, he thought it right to have a bust of Rev Martin Luther King Jr in the Oval Office “to remind him of the people who helped get him there”.

The bust of Dr King sits on a table alongside the fireplace and is often pictured as Obama meets visiting dignitaries for talks.

What I am saying is that he made a statement based on his understanding. That changes the context of what you are referring to as "lying." Originally Posted by YummyMarie

Speaking of context, I'll only chime in here to say that my statement was based in the context of the available Showcase options...as I mentioned in my very first post...but, carry on...

P.S.-While many a whore is interested in the state of my member, and the touching thereof, just for you I'll answer...five...

Wait! ... You mean you can tell lies on here?

Speaking of context, I'll only chime in here to say that my statement was based in the context of the available Showcase options... Originally Posted by Wakeup

Her showcase has the designation

Caucasian / White

It may have changed since the start of the thread.

She stated she is Caucasian in the thread.

You stated she admitted she is not Caucasian.

This was a lie.

Where is the excusing context or misunderstanding?

I am truly baffled. I didn't think you were quite this stupid or mendacious.

I think I'd like to change my custom user title to #OffWhite or #BrownCaucazoid

OP wants to be as smart as WU. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Or extreme douchebaggery. I can't tell.

I was thinking more akin to WTF or Whispers

Yeah - either way YM, they all look pretty stupid trying to stir up shit.

Damn redcoats.
Semantics be damned.
Did they forget we have squirrel guns in the closet?

OP: I will give you that he "distorted," her statement to create a butterfly effect that would eventually lead to the here and now with your name in his mouth and his dick in his hand.

Wakeup, how many times have we fapped so far??? Originally Posted by YummyMarie

I was going to say that this is just spank bank material for him