From what I have observed, the one to miss is Reagan. Originally Posted by London RayneI miss Ronaldus Maximus too!
A little story from the Great Man himself!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQAwd...D742852DF0733B
From what I have observed, the one to miss is Reagan. Originally Posted by London RayneI miss Ronaldus Maximus too!
I hope you're right. But my money is on Hillary using him as a photo op in her campaign, the same way Stalin used Trotsky to further the "cause". If he isn't a complete idiot he'll voluntarily get out of her way this time, and very soon. Originally Posted by IaintlieinSay what you will about Obama, but he has Stalin's courage....he doesn't back down, doesn't yield, doesn't compromise, always pushes forward, doesn't care how many have to sacrifice......he has done BIG things as president.....he must be defeated
Say what you will about Obama, but he has Stalin's courage....he doesn't back down, doesn't yield, doesn't compromise, always pushes forward, doesn't care how many have to sacrifice......he has done BIG things as president.....he must be defeatedStalin's courage? Stalin was a back room dealer and backstabber, he made his old comrade Trotsky a martyr for the revolution. . . Hillary is the one with Stalin's fortitude and ambition. Obumber is just a clean cut looking kid who reads well aloud.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-bY92mcOdk Originally Posted by Marshall
If his job approval rating ever gets down to George Bush levels, then you guys won't sound like complete idiots. Until then.... Originally Posted by DooveAccording to polls conducted by Gallup "W" rated a 59.6% approval during his third year (see below). Currently, Obama is below 50% (see below). Obama appears to be on track to match or out "perform" "W" in the negative approval column.
Say what you will about Obama, but he has Stalin's courage....he doesn't back down, doesn't yield, doesn't compromise, always pushes forward, doesn't care how many have to sacrifice......he has done BIG things as president.....he must be defeatedYou're on drugs. Obama is spineless. That's what's wrong with him. If he had any balls, we might have single payer health care. If he had any balls, we'd be out of Iraq and Afghanistan by now. If he had any balls, he wouldn't be dragging his feet appointing Federal judges. If he had any balls, he wouldn't be preaching budget cutting Republican lite now, he'd be have repealed the Bush tax cuts for the rich and running on our having the lowest tax rates in sixty years and fixing SS by eliminating the $108k wage cap for SS taxes. You could carve a President with more spine out of an overripe banana.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-bY92mcOdk Originally Posted by Marshall
You're on drugs. Obama is spineless. That's what's wrong with him. If he had any balls, we might have single payer health care. If he had any balls, we'd be out of Iraq and Afghanistan by now. If he had any balls, he wouldn't be dragging his feet appointing Federal judges. If he had any balls, he wouldn't be preaching budget cutting Republican lite now, he'd be have repealed the Bush tax cuts for the rich and running on our having the lowest tax rates in sixty years and fixing SS by eliminating the $108k wage cap for SS taxes. You could carve a President with more spine out of an overripe banana. Originally Posted by TexTushHogI'm a conservative, we don't destroy ourselves with drugs......
According to polls conducted by Gallup "W" rated a 59.6% approval during his third year (see below). Currently, Obama is below 50% (see below). Obama appears to be on track to match or out "perform" "W" in the negative approval column. Originally Posted by I B HankeringAccording to your ridiculous example, nearly every President in history would have been "on track" to spend their last 3 years in the mid to low 30's.
According to your ridiculous example, nearly every President in history would have been "on track" to spend their last 3 years in the mid to low 30's. Originally Posted by DooveWell excu-use me! You are the one who said "the polls" mattered. I merely showed you what the polls said. I guess you didn't look at the polls before you posted the first time; that, dear sir, is not my fault.
Well excu-use me! You are the one who said "the polls" mattered. Originally Posted by I B HankeringOh brother!
I merely showed you what the polls said.No, you also took it a step further by claiming the polls predicted the inevitability that Obama would end up in the low 30's. I only pointed out the idiotic nature of your claim.
I guess you didn't look at the polls before you posted the first time; that, dear sir, is not my fault.But using idiotic logic that needs to be refuted is your fault.