We can't keep evryone alive"

Cheat by mail and racism, which she still blames for her loss for Governor come to mind. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

Racism? From that statement, I assume you are stating that racism does not exist in this country. If Abrams blames her loss due to racism, that is not a policy.

Cheat by mail? Since I am eligible to vote by mail, I have gone into detail as to how difficult it would be to cheat. There are no facts that there has been major fraudulent voting by mail and certainly not any that favors one party over the other.

All you have to do is look at her voting record in office and the causes she supports! Shes a bitch on top of that! She is the typical lefty socialist that plays the perpetual victim card! FUCK THAT CUNT Originally Posted by winn dixie

Again, no specifics in your post as to which policies that she supports that you object to. To repeat, Stacy Abrams is not #1 on my list for VP with Biden, but so far no one has come up with objections to a specific policy that Abrams supports.

WYID mentioned cheating by mail. I do assume Abrams supports voting by mail and I have no problem with it.

SR- You are playing the DPST deflect and deny game.
Nothing anyone writes will satisfy you - so vote for Stacy - it is a free country until the DPST's manage to get a majority to close down the Constitution and inflict Orwellian government on the People
Perhaps with Stacy Abrams as "big sister"!
Vote for Her - .be my guest.

Again, no specifics in your post as to which policies that she supports that you object to. To repeat, Stacy Abrams is not #1 on my list for VP with Biden, but so far no one has come up with objections to a specific policy that Abrams supports.

WYID mentioned cheating by mail. I do assume Abrams supports voting by mail and I have no problem with it. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

See my post in "No Nancy" and you'll see my specific objection.


Abrams is most definitely my #1 choice for VP

What specific policies that Stacy Abrams supports do you believe will "destroy the country"? Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

When reading her Platform for her Georgia governor election, she reads like a typical liberal politician, which ideology wise, I believe will eventually destroy the country if implemented or she would be allowed control to move them forward.

https://staceyabrams.com/issues/

Her actual record of accomplishments is pretty thin and her stances on education(particularly vocal about resisting privatization, and a major focus of essentially continued expansion of affirmative action), gun control(wanting to repeal campus carry), Medicaid expansion, and others lead me to believe she would rubber stamp anything the liberals choose to put forth.

And on the personal note, she spends far too much time trying to hype the racism card and continue to whine about the fact that she lost the election(also being unwillingly to really concede the loss). While not policy, that just adds to the fact, I don't find her a personable candidate that would/could actually work in my interests.

Thank You - EL

SR- You are playing the DPST deflect and deny game.
Nothing anyone writes will satisfy you - so vote for Stacy - it is a free country until the DPST's manage to get a majority to close down the Constitution and inflict Orwellian government on the People
Perhaps with Stacy Abrams as "big sister"!
Vote for Her - .be my guest. Originally Posted by oeb11

I am not deflecting one bit. You keep saying Abrams' policies will destroy the country. I ask which specific policies she supports would do that. You respond by saying I am somehow deflecting.

I am not deflecting one bit. You keep saying Abrams' policies will destroy the country. I ask which specific policies she supports would do that. You respond by saying I am somehow deflecting. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

AGAIN-- Look at her voting record in office!

Theres your answer AAAAANNNNNDDDDD-- Your Sign

Thats how her and the left ARE destroying Murika

When reading her Platform for her Georgia governor election, she reads like a typical liberal politician, which ideology wise, I believe will eventually destroy the country if implemented or she would be allowed control to move them forward.

https://staceyabrams.com/issues/

Her actual record of accomplishments is pretty thin and her stances on education(particularly vocal about resisting privatization, and a major focus of essentially continued expansion of affirmative action), gun control(wanting to repeal campus carry), Medicaid expansion, and others lead me to believe she would rubber stamp anything the liberals choose to put forth.

And on the personal note, she spends far too much time trying to hype the racism card and continue to whine about the fact that she lost the election(also being unwillingly to really concede the loss). While not policy, that just adds to the fact, I don't find her a personable candidate that would/could actually work in my interests. Originally Posted by eccielover

Thank you for a substantive response to my question as opposed to OEB's response.

I agree that Abrams record of accomplishments is weak and is reason #1 why I have her far down the list as people I would like Biden to pick for his VP candidate.

I also agree that she overplayed the racism card when she lost the race for governor.

Her views on gun control would be expected. Not sure what you have against "Fully fund our public schools and protect them from privatization". Medicaid expansion is a tricky issue.

Yes she is a liberal but I would not put her in the far left liberal category. I don't think anything she is proposing would "destroy the country" as OEB suggested.

Obama was POTUS for 8 years and in my opinion did not destroy the country and much of what Abrams is proposing is the same as Obama. To repeat, I do not support Abrams as Biden's #1 choice for VP but she would do little to destroy the country.

AGAIN-- Look at her voting record in office!

Theres your answer AAAAANNNNNDDDDD-- Your Sign

Thats how her and the left ARE destroying Murika Originally Posted by winn dixie

Did you miss the words "specific policies"?

Not sure what you have against "Fully fund our public schools and protect them from privatization". Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

When the effort for fully funding public schools results in her rejection of charter schools and school choice, then I find her stance falling into the normal liberal public school agenda of we know what's better for you and your children than you do.

I'm all for charter schools and school choice. That combined with her affirmative action stance regarding education leads me to believe she just wants to continue to throw money at the already failing education system.

And the education or in the liberal eye "indoctrination" of our children is one of the very things I think that could lead to the destruction of our society.

At least she didn't say she would put a 9 year old Trans child in charge of picking the next Secy. of Education ( Warren ) so she has that going for her.


Wait, I think Warren just told Abrams if she wants Warren's support, she'll have to give that Trans child a position on her VP team..... Never mind!


Yes, that was sarcasm.