Providers Posting Negative Threads

"Valkyrie" is another movie worth checking out. It is based on the story of Claus von Staffenberg, the man who unsuccessfully tried to assassinate Hitler during WWII.

Xperiment: Absolutely, but he was used by many in the beginning due to his charismatic speeches at the Hofbrauhaus in Munich. Little did they know they had elected a madman who blocked the doors and declared himself "Leader" or " Fuhrer"...he imprisoned and/or executed anyone who opposed his views.

How did this turn into a Hitler discussion????

It truly is a fascinating time in History, and I've had the privilege of visiting Munich and Berlin...

As of today, the Neo-Nazi Party is fully recognized in Berlin and they even hold office there...apparently they found loop-holes and have enough supporters. As long as they are not "extremists" it's perfectly acceptable. There are still instances of graffiti, and in one recent case a disabled gentleman had a swastika carved on his forehead by some punk ass losers.

It didn't happen overnight...I could easily see a society falling victim to the propaganda of a crazy man. However, genocide is still present in other countries.

Just another argument as to why History is so valuable.

Hitler and Chaney in the same sentence? Hitler lived either in Austria or Germany most of his life. Chaney was in Transylvania. Weird coupling, IMO.

Hitler and Chaney in the same sentence? Hitler lived either in Austria or Germany most of his life. Chaney was in Transylvania. Weird coupling, IMO. Originally Posted by barneyrubble

You talking Dick or Lon????

You talking Dick or Lon???? Originally Posted by charlestudor2005

Doesn't matter, Lon and Lon Jr spelled it Chaney. The former veep, Dick spells it Cheney.

When women aren't so much as ranting, which probably is never attractive, but just sharing thoughts about the industry and experiences, do you then think poorly of them?

I depends on the rant or whatever in question. My best friend is a provider with whom I've never had a provider/client relationship. I'm well aware that some clients (and escorts) are just sociopaths whose absence from the world of p4p could only be an improvement and I have no reason to disbelieve her.

Is it a massive turn off? Does it help put things into a little bit of perspective, just understanding the thoughts of companions even when they're more selfish and emotional then logical?

Unless what I'm reading is logically coherent and I'm being given what are claimed to be facts (as opposed to judgments and inferences), I have no way to draw my own conclusion. Emotional content only gets in the way of trying to figure out what the actual problem is.

I personally feel the value of such things is hearing the other side, putting me in check a bit, or at least trying to understand why things happen they way they do.

The advantage to leaving out judgments, inferences and emotional content is that by sticking to the facts, both sides are more likely to have a number of things which neither side disputes and which makes discrepancies easier to spot. It helps to state things as clearly and concisely as possible. If that is how a post is written, I can't see why such posts should be seen negatively (or positively). Facts have no morality. They simply are.