In response to his harsh criticism, Dershowitz claims Corey called Harvard Law School and, "threatened to sue the institution, get me disciplined by the Bar, and made accusations of libel and slander".[27] Angela Corey has been indicted by a citizens' grand jury, convening in Ocala, Florida, over the alleged falsification of the arrest warrant and complaint that lead to George Zimmerman being charged with the second degree murder of Trayvon Martin.[28] An IT director at the State Attorney's office was fired after disclosing information that was not released to the defense.[29]eh
Looking at the diagram of where Zimmerman said his car was...where he claims he was assaulted and where the body was found...Martin
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...rtin.html?_r=0
It makes more sense that Zimmerman after crossing the cut to the opposite street was on his way back, still searching to re-acquire eyes on Marti, entered between the house rows to continue his search, then found/approached Martin to confront him.
The notion of Martin doubling back to ambush the hapless (yet emboldened enough by being armed to follow a guy he thought was a criminal [well at least he was black, which is kind of the same thing, right George?] through a neighborhood at night in the rain) Zimmerman seems pretty far-fetched.
Seriously, which of those two guys based on their phone calls leading up to the incident seemed more disposed to push things? Try to be objective. Originally Posted by MajorHands
a Judge that does not understand legal boundaries. Trial was doomed before it started. Originally Posted by roscoe14850So we can assume you're a legal professional - since that's pretty much what you're telling us.
Martin Originally Posted by offshoredrillingAnd yet another individual who's lost the right to consider the people on the OJ jury stupid.
Who dos this Niger think he is killing white kidsScoot is a hero in my book,
Looking at the diagram of where Zimmerman said his car was...where he claims he was assaulted and where the body was found...A lot of conjecture to reach that point. In a TRIAL you need to PROVE IT. Based on your reasoning I could argue Martin was a troubled youth with a past of street fighting, drug use, & larceny. Video, Tweets, Texts & school disciplinary reports exist that prove this. But this was a TRIAL. That evidence was not admitted and is moot. Based on the preponderance of evidence so is your argument. In a trial it doesn't matter what YOU think is far-fetched, makes sense, or is a notion; it's what's provable by the prosecution. Once again it is the prosecutions job to build a case they can win with charges that will stick. They failed and they knew it, which was why they added Manslaughter at the last moment. That along with the puzzling behavior of the judge will give the defense ample justification for an appeal that is likely to win.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...rtin.html?_r=0
It makes more sense that Zimmerman after crossing the cut to the opposite street was on his way back, still searching to re-acquire eyes on Marti, entered between the house rows to continue his search, then found/approached Martin to confront him.
The notion of Martin doubling back to ambush the hapless (yet emboldened enough by being armed to follow a guy he thought was a criminal [well at least he was black, which is kind of the same thing, right George?] through a neighborhood at night in the rain) Zimmerman seems pretty far-fetched.
Seriously, which of those two guys based on their phone calls leading up to the incident seemed more disposed to push things? Try to be objective. Originally Posted by MajorHands
Lessonlearned don't attack people especially gun owners. Originally Posted by Hero Zimmermanwelcome to upset NY..lol
Lock and load. Riots are coming. If he is found guilty it won't be because of evidence or facts. Originally Posted by Hero Zimmermantrue dat.