Though I've never been to Taylor's glory hole, I've heard a lot about it from some males and females who have. It was my understanding that her "fluffing" services were quite substantial. That there was some lap dancing involved, etc. That she was in some way a part of the show and that the act of being lead to the glory hole by a sensual woman, fluffed, and then watched by her was part of the turn on. She is present and in a sensual role throughout the session -- not some manager on a cell phone booking and then having her free time to do whatever she pleases across town while the session is going on. I even heard of a day where she worked the "hole" herself and had someone else do the fluffing, again splitting the tribute. It sounds like a team effort and a 50/50 split seems more than fair.Well, everyone else is to judge, why else post it in CoEd? But judgment is certainly easier and more accurate with more information, thanks again.
Thanks for the input, Sophia. As described by you it certainly does sound fair.
The 10% idea is kinda absurd. I do a lot of doubles sessions and it isn't usually both girls physically causing the pop at the same time. The presence of both is stimulating and leads to the pop, and both are equally valuable. The girl who is the direct "cause" of the pop doesn't take 90% of the haul.
10% seemed fair for the agent stuff, marketing and screening; certainly not for the duo performance you describe, though, good point.
Nobody has ever been forced to work the GH. Her terms are spelled out in plain English and advertised to experienced escorts (girls on Eccie as opposed to newbies off of CL) who are familiar with the market and know what they are getting into. She isn't plucking unsuspecting teens from strip clubs. These women know what their time is worth. If a lady happens to think working this GH is worth her time, who is anyone else to judge? It's certainly not my cup of tea but I don't knock anyone for trying it. Originally Posted by Sensual Sophia