The Anti-Kavanaugh Protest Links To George Soros

its a first amendment right according to the supreme court that ruled on that issue over 100 years ago.

just is deal with it.

interestingly, the past has present day connections with kavanaugh.

if i remember the story right, it was over a way to damage another mans reputation by way of a protest mob who were paid and fed a pack of lies.


that type of rent-a-mob shouldn't be legal, but it is. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Protesting is a guaranteed right, but i never knew that got extended to PAYING people to protest..
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Try and stick with the facts.

Your boogie man just doesn’t dance.

You know Trump and the GOP thugs in the Senate did something morally reprehensible and are desperate to make it right with their own consciences.

Blame it on George Soros. He’s the go to when you can’t blame it on Clinton (though Justice Fuckstick certainly tried to do it during his hysterical outburst last week.)

Just. Isn’t. Factual.

https://www.factcheck.org/2018/09/vi...ros-with-ford/

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices...-a8377301.html

Red meat for the guilty.
rexdutchman's Avatar
there's a face based site Yeah okay , UPA , go back to watchin CNN
I B Hankering's Avatar
Try and stick with the facts.

Your boogie man just doesn’t dance.

You know Trump and the GOP thugs in the Senate did something morally reprehensible and are desperate to make it right with their own consciences.

Blame it on George Soros. He’s the go to when you can’t blame it on Clinton (though Justice Fuckstick certainly tried to do it during his hysterical outburst last week.)

Just. Isn’t. Factual.

https://www.factcheck.org/2018/09/vi...ros-with-ford/

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices...-a8377301.html

Red meat for the guilty.
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
It's a pleasure to inform you that your cited articles have nothing to do with the OP and how Soros' money is involved in paying anti-Trump protesters. One would hope you were aware of that before you posted, but then that would raise a whole set of new questions as to why you posted something that was irrelevant to the topic: "The Anti-Kavanaugh Protest Links To George Soros."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojS80kK88ls

ELEVATOR PROTESTER ADMITS SHE WORKS FOR SOROS-FUNDED ORGANIZATION

As media outlets accused the president of spreading a conspiracy about George Soros paying protesters, one protester admitted on MSNBC that she works for a Soros-funded activist group....

“Are you a paid professional?” MSNBC anchor Hallie Jackson asked Archila.

I work for a community organization, I work for a network of community organizations,” Archila said, adding that it is her “job” to organize people into action....

One of the two protesters who confronted Flake in the elevator is Ana Maria Archila, an executive director of the Center for Popular Democracy (CPD). The other protester, Maria Gallagher, is an activist with the group. The CPD is indeed heavily funded by George Soros through the Open Society Foundation.

(The Daily Caller)
@: 1:50

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9l9W-DNJhhA
Yssup Rider's Avatar
What are you trying to say. IBH? That I wasn’t responding to the previous accusations made by someone OTHER THAN YOU spreading false allegations about Soros?

Enjoy your pleasure.
I B Hankering's Avatar
What are you trying to say. IBH? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Au contraire. You are the one who needs to explain why you cited articles that were not related to the topic and thus irrelevant to the topic: "The Anti-Kavanaugh Protest Links To George Soros."

For instance, you could have posted these videos (see below and those previously cited) from ABC, CNN and MSNBC wherein the talking-heads admit that anti-Trump protesters were being paid, then you wouldn't have been off topic.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBPGhZsu2Po
Au contraire. You are the one who needs to explain why you cited articles that were not related to the topic and thus irrelevant to the topic: "The Anti-Kavanaugh Protest Links To George Soros."

For instance, you could have posted these videos (see below and those previously cited) from ABC, CNN and MSNBC wherein the talking-heads admit that anti-Trump protesters were being paid, then you wouldn't have been off topic.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBPGhZsu2Po Originally Posted by I B Hankering
I think you provided sufficient evidence and I'm glad the links are so public and well known that any reasonable person would have to accept them.
I B Hankering's Avatar
George Soros’s March on Washington

October 8, 2018

Some 200 protesters march across the lawn of the U.S. Capitol to the foot of the south wing. Inside, the U.S. Senate is wrapping up its debate, hours before the Saturday afternoon vote to confirm Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Members of the crowd rush up the steps, unfurl professionally printed banners, stand defiantly, and pump their fists in the air.

“Whose house?” they shout.

“Our house!” they answer.

By the time of the vote, they’ve moved across the street to the Supreme Court building. After getting word of the vote, again they rush the steps. Two women climb the statues flanking the steps—“Contemplation of Justice” and “Authority of Law”—for more fist-pumps.

On the steps, Bob Bland, a co-founder of the Women’s March, silently sends a thumbs-up signal to another leader, later boasting: “We took the Supreme Court.” On Friday the Women’s March had tweeted out a photo of Sen. Susan Collins, who cast the deciding vote for Justice Kavanaugh, with “Rape Apologist” written across her image.

In a series of tweets and rally comments, President Trump described the crowd as “an angry left-wing mob” of “professional protesters who are handed expensive signs” and “paid for by [George] Soros and others.” Mr. Trump’s detractors accused him of engaging in conspiracy theories, and even of anti-Semitism against Mr. Soros, a billionaire donor to liberal causes. Yet he has a point. Many Americans genuinely oppose Mr. Trump and Justice Kavanaugh. I am a liberal feminist whose views on abortion and same-sex marriage align with the Democratic Party’s. Yet while most demonstrators are not paid for their efforts, the protests at the Capitol Saturday, and the ones that have included stalking lawmakers inside and outside their offices, are organized by groups of which Mr. Soros is an important patron.

I started following the money for the “resistance” when it was born, hours after Election Day 2016. I have organized my findings in a spreadsheet I have made public. At least 50 of the largest organizations that participated as “partners” in the Jan. 21, 2017, Women’s March had received grants from Mr. Soros’s Open Society Foundations or similar funds in the “House of Soros,” as his philanthropic empire was once called internally. The number of Soros-backed partners has grown to at least 80. At least 20 of the largest groups that led the Saturday anti-Kavanaugh protests have been Open Society grantees.

On Saturday I also studied the fine print on the signs as protesters waved them defiantly at the Capitol and the high court. They came from a familiar list of Democratic interest groups that have received millions from Mr. Soros: the American Civil Liberties Union, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, Planned Parenthood, NARAL Pro-Choice America, the Center for Popular Democracy, Human Rights Campaign and on and on. MoveOn.org, a Democratic organizing and lobbying group founded with Soros money, sent its army of partisan followers regular missives that led them to a Google form to ask for train tickets and places to stay.

Under a ginkgo tree on the East Lawn of the Capitol, Center for Popular Democracy field marshals put protesters through a “training” Saturday morning. “Are you ready to be arrested?” she asks. “Yes!” the crowd shouts, although one woman asks quietly: “For what?”

“If not,” the field marshal orders, “stand in line for the visitor’s gallery so an experienced protester can go inside and yell.” One organizer hands out tickets to the Senate visitors gallery for the express purpose of violating the law. That they did—the proceedings were repeatedly interrupted by shrieks from the gallery.

The agitators even have help with their handmade signs. Across the street from the Supreme Court, a woman uses supplies provided by UltraViolet Action to write, in Spanish: “No more rapists in power.”

Back on the Capitol lawn, people from Megaphone Strategies, a public-relations firm founded by former Obama adviser Van Jones, manage interview requests from USA Today and other news outlets. Women’s March lieutenants exchange T-shirts for completed “Legal Support Sheets” with information in case of arrest.

Suddenly everyone stands to walk in unison to the Capitol steps. When they arrive, the few Capitol Police officers on the scene silently watch them. The protesters walk up the stairs—though they don’t “storm” them, as the leaders have claimed. There are no barricades, no phalanx of armed police.

Rethink Media created a “social media strategy sheet” back in August for anti-Kavanaugh protesters. One talking point: “Kavanaugh was hand-picked by dark money groups and their billionaire backers.” Rethink Media is itself a Soros grantee, and Saturday’s protests and unlawful disruptions were part of a well-funded, orchestrated network that books buses, hotel rooms and churches for such agitation.

MoveOn.org wrote a guide, “How to Bird Dog”—harass officials in public places—in the spring of 2017, in preparation for town-hall meetings during a congressional recess. Over the past year, I have dialed in to MoveOn.org’s Sunday evening phone calls where they plan the operations and tell their “troublemakers” how to corner lawmakers. I still get alerts for their planning sessions. The last ones have been to #stopKavanaugh.

MoveOn.org announced that its call the night after Justice Kavanaugh’s confirmation would feature Ana Maria Archila, the Colombia-born sexual-assault victim who cornered Sen. Jeff Flake in a Senate elevator last month while a confederate screamed “Look at me!” She is co-executive director of the Center for Popular Democracy. Her salary was listed as $156,333, with a bonus of $21,378, in a recent Internal Revenue Service 990 form.

What I have pieced together is an open secret but one that journalists tend to avoid. Many (including me) sympathize with the liberal causes Open Society champions. Some have been paid Open Society Fellows or grantees. And many are put off by conservative anti-Soros rhetoric, which gets truculent at times.

Mr. Soros, much like the Koch brothers, funds causes he cares about. There’s nothing wrong with that, but democracy is better served if we follow the money on the right and left and find solutions where they are likeliest to lie: in the middle.

Ms. Nomani is a former Wall Street Journal reporter.

(WSJ)
.
What's behind the protests is the alleged offense.
And pray tell. Enlighten us Cum.. What do YOU think's behind them?