Providers, will you see a client who see's TS's?

CRAP! This OP just threw Sweet Mandy under the bus, the one that runs through my old school neighborhood.

I had been thinking about trying to meet with her. Now, dammit, the YUK factor threw her off my "list". And it probably isn't even her fault. She probably had no clue about the homosexuality of her client. Dammit.

The food you left sitting out overnight might be perfectly fine, but the idea of roaches running all over it while you were asleep is all that's needed to decide to toss it.

Since we're past April fools day.

Frankly I don't see it. I mean what if a guy saw a TS and had a safe hobby experience. So, what's the big deal? Isn't this whole hobby thing about fulfilling fantasies? More power to the guy who saw a TS, better him than some guy who thinks about it, but doesn't cross the line. To be honest, some of the TS ladies (guys, whatever) are pretty fine. If I had to cross the line and have sex with something with a dick, better some hot TS than some hairy chested guy with a mustache, and lots of body hair, but I don't have to. I've always considered seeing a TS as having a homosexual experience, but since the TS appeared to be partially female, it was a homosexual experience without being a homosexual. If that makes any sense at all.

We have to take into consideration what my buddy John353 stated. People only know what the know. For all we know, there are several guys who've seen TS, but it wasn't reviewed and the guy kept it to himself.

I won't see ladies who give brown showers (shit on someone) or rainbow showers (puke on someone) but the fact is, some guy somewhere out there has a fantasy about that stuff. For my own reasons, that is my hangup. Maybe I've seen a lady in the past who does this stuff, but I never knew it going in.

I respect ladies who have set standards, and I'm sure they have their own reasons. What I don't respect is those who have floating standards where they're relaxed when the rent comes due.

I'm no expert on TS providers, and I'll go on the record by saying that I have no interest in venturing forth into that side of the hobby.

However, I will say that not all TS are 100% gay. Some are actually known to have sex with biological women as well as other men. Call it what you want, but that is bi-sexual.

Now, here's a hypothetical situation.

What if one of you chest beating heteros out there has an ATF that took part in a session for mucho dinero...that involved a TS? What if she got fucked in every orifice in her body by another man, the only thing is...he has bigger bolt-ons than she has, and happens to wear lipstick and high heels?

Here's the kicker... She doesn't bother to tell you or anybody else for that matter, because it isn't any of your fricken business. So...you see her because she's your ATF but you have no clue that she just got pounded two hours earlier.......by a TS with a bigger cock than yours.

...and you have no clue because why would she feel the need to tell...you? Who are you...someone special that needs to be informed of every sex partner she chooses to see? Get over yourself.

This hobby is full of risks. Accept it, or take up crochet.

My .02 on the matter. Originally Posted by john353

Yes it is and yes we do have to accept those risk by participating in this....

Just to ask a question to all of you guys..... What would be enough to piss you off if you found out after the fact that a provider did and you didn't get to say "I wouldn't have seen her if I had known that."

This hobby is full of risks. Accept it, or take up crochet.

My .02 on the matter. Originally Posted by john353

Fucker!

Said in one sentence what it took me 15 minutes to type.

Nice job ole buddy.

I'm no expert on TS providers, and I'll go on the record by saying that I have no interest in venturing forth into that side of the hobby.

However, I will say that not all TS are 100% gay. Some are actually known to have sex with biological women as well as other men. Call it what you want, but that is bi-sexual.

Now, here's a hypothetical situation.

What if one of you chest beating heteros out there has an ATF that took part in a session for mucho dinero...that involved a TS? What if she got fucked in every orifice in her body by another man, the only thing is...he has bigger bolt-ons than she has, and happens to wear lipstick and high heels?

Here's the kicker... She doesn't bother to tell you or anybody else for that matter, because it isn't any of your fricken business. So...you see her because she's your ATF but you have no clue that she just got pounded two hours earlier.......by a TS with a bigger cock than yours.

...and you have no clue because why would she feel the need to tell...you? Who are you...someone special that needs to be informed of every sex partner she chooses to see? Get over yourself.

This hobby is full of risks. Accept it, or take up crochet.

My .02 on the matter. Originally Posted by john353

No-one can say it better than that!!!! There is not a provider out there that will tell you the name(s) of the guy(s) she just saw that morning, the night before, and the previous week's sessions.....

Nor will a guy tell the provider he is ABOUT to see which providers he has seen in the last week/month.

Yes it is and yes we do have to accept those risk by participating in this... Originally Posted by Eccie Addict

We're talking about different things...I'm not worrying about risk, it's the damn nausea that bugs me.

I know Don I was responding to others.....

We all have our reasons for things whatever they are.

Well I really was gearing this more for responses from providers as I know the general consensus with the guys. Donny, you shouldn't let the fact I reviewed her and I've seen a TS keep you from seeing her. She is still the same sweety she was before I met with her. Try to open up your mind a little.

So you have made 14 of them our business. My point exactly. Just saying dear. Originally Posted by Naomi4u

Because I chose to make those 14 reviews public.

Lets quote you again...

What happens BCD is everyone's business. Hello?

Um...Hello!! NO...IT...ISN'T!!!

It is NONE of your business unless the person makes it your business. HOw many of your clients that you see regularly, also cruise on the down low behind the bushes in city parks? None? ...are you sure about that?

What is your point again?

I agree with everything you've said here spirit. I just don't get people that purposely hide what they are into or hide the type of person they are by keeping handles seperate from their p411 or whatever therefore keeping a woman they want to see from knowing what they are into. There are many that have freely admitted to doing so..... Originally Posted by Eccie Addict

I understand the multi handle thing and we on here are the reason:
Tineye.com google searches on phone numbers.

If a person was to search handles etc to see what ELSE a person was into then that is dangerously close to cyberstalking. If a person engages in some form of activity that you do not approve of, but does so in a private manner, do you shun them?

You might do something in your REAL life that I might oppose yet I won't shun you.

Like drug use..... I do not use drugs, I refuse to see a lady who uses drugs or is on them when I go to see her, I see/smell - detect drug usage I am gone, same goes for drinking on the job for her... its one thing to have a few beers in the fridge of your house or hotel room.. its another to be drinking beer ghetto style before and during the session.

You would not see me if I was drunk or stoned.... mainly because its the booze and drugs that usually bring out the worst in someone.

But if you choose to get buzzed at home on booze or drugs on your own time... I cannot stop you..

just be sober and straight when I hang out with you.

its a respect.

I can tell you that some do. Which is kind of silly, but whatever. TS more risky than a streetwalker? I think not. Risks no matter what you do, safety is as safety does.

What some will admit to, is not as bad as what others won't.

I understand the multi handle thing and we on here are the reason:
Tineye.com google searches on phone numbers.

If a person was to search handles etc to see what ELSE a person was into then that is dangerously close to cyberstalking. If a person engages in some form of activity that you do not approve of, but does so in a private manner, do you shun them?

You might do something in your REAL life that I might oppose yet I won't shun you.

Like drug use..... I do not use drugs, I refuse to see a lady who uses drugs or is on them when I go to see her, I see/smell - detect drug usage I am gone, same goes for drinking on the job for her... its one thing to have a few beers in the fridge of your house or hotel room.. its another to be drinking beer ghetto style before and during the session.

You would not see me if I was drunk or stoned.... mainly because its the booze and drugs that usually bring out the worst in someone.

But if you choose to get buzzed at home on booze or drugs on your own time... I cannot stop you..

just be sober and straight when I hang out with you.

its a respect. Originally Posted by Spirit13

So if you found out a provider that you saw was known through back channels to keep drugs on her would you be pissed..... Would you be pissed cause you didn't know therefore your option to say no was taken away?

I started a new thread on my questions to avaoid hijacking OOB's thread here....lol.

http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=201228

I can tell you that some do. Which is kind of silly, but whatever. TS more risky than a streetwalker? I think not. Risks no matter what you do, safety is as safety does.

What some will admit to, is not as bad as what others won't. Originally Posted by thirtyfour

I think this is a very good point.

If I HAD TO CHOOSE between a clean and healthy looking TS or a street walker with needle marks in her arms, and had just set the crack pipe down, give me the TS. I'm trying to make a point, but it is extreme with this description.

Point being is that there are too many guys who can't see anything past the dick (s)he is swinging. No matter what.

What is your point again? Originally Posted by john353

I've made it already. Now you just sound silly. NEXT!

I can tell you that some do. Which is kind of silly, but whatever. TS more risky than a streetwalker? I think not. Risks no matter what you do, safety is as safety does.

What some will admit to, is not as bad as what others won't. Originally Posted by thirtyfour

You make an excellent point. Noone really KNOWS what these guys are doing in their personal lives.
This hobby IS about fullfilling fantasies right? I will have to retract the statement I made earlier and say this...
If I were seeing a guy and found out he saw trannies, I would cut him off in a New York minute. The thought of him being with another MAN (and let's not forget that's what a tranny is) would gross me out. Now, That's just my preference. I'm very open-minded but when it comes to undercover gays or trannys? not so much.

I have no alternate handles. This is my only one. There is no "taint" that I carry, there is no "taint" that a woman has after seeing me. I cannot change your mind. You must come to that decision yourself. My main goal in starting this thread was to gauge whether or not if provider's attitude towards men was still in effect causing them to be hesitant to post reviews. I certainly don't want to TOFTT when I choose to see a TS. I think if the attitude were a little more receptive on the provider's end we would have more TS reviews. This is 2011 after all.