Well, you did add it...so I questioned it. I'm not sure why that is outside the bounds of reason?
Actually it is a population increase estimate...so it is net. I'm sure there are more moving both directions. Now that you have that "context"...are you more enlightened?
Originally Posted by Rudyard K
You threw a number out there...so I questioned it
I'm not sure why that is outside the bounds of reason?
btw, if that is net that is a huge number of people....
A comprehensive immigration plan has to have three pieces
1. Control of borders
2. A guest worker program (i.e., come work in season, make some money, go home)
3. A resolution of the illegals that are here and have been for a while.
You can't do any of the three without doing the other 2. A guest worker program will take the pressure off the border control -- there would be a safer/easier way to work here. Any kind of amnesty would open a floodgate of people trying to get in under the wire. Control of borders can't be done without dealing with the economics.
Sadly, different constituencies want different elements and not the others so this is going to be a political football for a while.
Originally Posted by pjorourke
Agree. I think most people can get together on 1&2....
3 is where we have a problem
You're right on track with your last two posts, PJ. Word!
Originally Posted by John Bull
JB, the full service moderator....he even cheerleads from time to time....