Jonestown is calling for you. They got some Okool-aid for you. Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
He must have hit a dinger you forgot to call him a cocksucker.
"Is there STILL Oblunder holdouts around here..."As we ALL know, bumper stickers are the true measure of someone's popularity ... I expected that from CHOHN or Simple Jack, but you?
There does seem to be a scarcity of Obaminable bumper stickers as of late. Even in 2012. Originally Posted by LexusLover
Please explain to me how Obama can selectively NOT enforce a law, much less advertise that he's going to selectively not enforce it? Is it an EO or something? What other laws is he voluntarily not enforcing? Originally Posted by gnadflyHaven't you learn anything of eccie.edu ... the more laws you have the more chances someone will break one
Hey, don't get me wrong. For my business, where we HAVE to furnish health care and other benefits in order to keep our highly skilled employs, Obama Care evens out the playing field with competitors who offer nothing. They will now have to either furnish healthcare, or pay the fines entailed. Originally Posted by Jackie SAnd, this is bad - how? If one is in a business that requires skilled employees why would he/she not want to keep them if they produce? Only whining fools perpetuate a business environment for themselves that is harder than it should be. If needlessly fostering inefficiency and poor quality and service qualifies as having their cake and eating it, too - then more power to them. If the extra money makes up for the hassle and wear and tear then they should keep their mouths shut. No one is holding a gun to their head in order to make them do what they choose to do.
And, this is bad - how? If one is in a business that requires skilled employees why would he/she not want to keep them if they produce? Only whining fools perpetuate a business environment for themselves that is harder than it should be. Originally Posted by Randy4CandyActually, i would have to throw a few props Jackie's way for his viewpoint on this. It's the rare (successful) conservative who is against something that's good for him, because he believes it bad for the country as a whole.
Actually, i would have to throw a few props Jackie's way for his viewpoint on this. It's the rare (successful) conservative who is against something that's good for him, because he believes it bad for the country as a whole.It's like a construction company whose owner hires permanent employs, pays all of his federal with holdings as per the law, offers all of his workers benefits, and is a responsible member of the community.
More often than not, they manage to convince themselves that what's good for the country begins and ends with what's good for them. Originally Posted by Doove
ZIP...NADA...
This has gotten so sophisticated that at some pick up sites, you can even get a "foreman" that has his own ready made crew. You hire the whole package, pay the "foreman, he takes care of his men.
How much income tax, SS, and health care do you suppose was taken out of all this? Originally Posted by Jackie S
By having the Government mandate that the playing field be evened out, especially in something as expensive as health care, is a plus. Originally Posted by Jackie SAnd i say, force businesses, all businesses, to provide health-care to their employees....and tax businesses to pay for the people who aren't employed. This way, the economy fully subsidizes the country's health-care.
And i say, force businesses, all businesses, to provide health-care to their employees....and tax businesses to pay for the people who aren't employed. This way, the economy fully subsidizes the country's health-care.And that's why we call you a socialist/marxist asshole.
I would think even COG would be on board with this proposal in that it makes subsidizing someone else's health-care completely optional. You don't wanna subsidize anyone's health-care, just don't buy anything. Win/win. Originally Posted by Doove