Dove, this is the second time you've asked me for this explanation. Did my ignoring it the first time you asked for it somehow confuse you? I didn't ignore it because I didn't see it, I ignored it because the question itself is ignorant. It seems I'm forced to explain the obvious simply so certain people can feel better about the world...
Originally Posted by Wakeuр
It's not the only question you've ignored, but it seems the only one you're willing to answer. My guess is it's because you seem to think you can plausibly (or not) lie your way through it.
I asked the OP a very specific question in that other thread.
Yes you did.
Second, I used the word "supposedly", I used it simply because I have no knowledge of whether or not they were even posted,
all I'm going on is the OPs information, and as part of that, even IF they were posted, I have no idea if the place was private or not. I wanted confirmation from the OP before I answered. The OP answered my question very specifically.
Pretty clever set up. You seem uncharacteristically interested in what goes on in the UNY forums relative to this singular issue. One might suspect you became interested in an UNY posting because you caught wind of Chloe talking about something that happened, and you knew it happened in the spider hole.
Plead ignorance all you want, you ain't fooling anybody.
But since you wish to play your little rhetorical word games, then let's.
The OP has now done several things. One, she has said again that the pictures were posted somewhere,
Yeah, so? I'll say it too. Someone posted pictures of Chloe in one or more of the private lounges. Should i now be banned?
so she's confirmed to me that she has information from someone that they were in fact posted in forums.
No she didn't. What she did was simply confirm that she knew they were posted. What's the difference, you say? Ahhh, well here's the rub...
In the Men's Lounge it's obvious that she doesnt have access, but she also says that the information was "leaked" to her,
Oh? That's how you read it, is it?
Four, she admits that the information was given to her by another person who does have access to those forums in some way (much longer discussion).
Yeah......but....... Here's what she, in fact, said:
"Mens lounge and spiderhole. I will never understand how anyone had fun mocking the photos of my knocked unconscious body and cuts on my face from a traumatic experience. It is sick and disturbing how low some of you get here.
If the question of how i found out or who leaked it to me is the first thing on you mind you need to question your twisted motivations, the fact is that it was done, many of you encouarged it and the moderators let it happen.
I notified 4 moderators a while ago about a picture and nothing was done. Now that i made this public they are finally taking care of it."
At no point did she ever say that the info was leaked to her. If you're relying on her saying "...the fact is that it was done...", what she's actually referring to is the posting of the pictures. That, and at no point did she ever say that she obtained the info on her own.
Rest assured, there are ways of finding out things that occur (or, key point,
will occur) in the private forums without someone reading it themselves, or, more importantly in this case, without it being leaked information. Ways that are far more plausible than your "i just asked out of curiosity" nonsense you want us to believe.
A perfect example, someone who has it in for Chloe tells her in an email that out of some twisted sense of spite, he is going to post pictures of her in the ML and in the SH. So what we have is, she knows there are going to be pictures, but she found out about it before the pictures were actually posted. Hence, no leak. Gossip, perhaps, but no leak.
Like i said, you wanna rely on rhetorical slight of hand....
My follow up discussions were in no way confirming that the pictures were in fact posted in either/both of those private forums.
And i think they were, but you're free to read it differently.
My follow up discussions were just assuming that the OP wasn't lying when she asserted that the information was "leaked" to her from a "private forum". I have absolutely no firsthand knowledge of the truth of her claims to offer you here.
Uh huh.
You have no firsthand knowledge of the truth of her claims "
to offer me here".
Does that answer your question?
Yes, you've, ahem, answered my question.
One of them, at least.
By the way, which subforum rule are you relying on here? Exactly?
P.S.-I'm not responsible for other posters here on the board.
Ah, but you
are responsible for Chloe?
P.P.S.-Don't take the lack of Chloe being banned as me being "full of shit".
Maybe i will.....maybe i won't.
I believe she's fine with taking her punishment now that it has been explained to her, and I seriously doubt she'll make the same mistake again.
Yeah, next time she'll just need to be more careful in how she words things. Kinda like you.