Sylvester Turner Elected Mayor of Houston

Yeh, but for some of the greedy Demagogues who tend to run big city Governments, "extraterritorial jurisdiction" could be anything between Houston and Dallas.

The only way they can keep the coffers filled is to keep chasing the tax base. Originally Posted by Jackie S

Don't feel alone over there in Houston. The lying liberals here in San Antonio are afflicted with the same " spread the tax base, annex all we can, then tax and spend till the constituents limp ! " syndrome. These idiot liberal hicks were even sued a few years back for eliminating a liberal Hispanic gay rights organization's funding ( Esperanza Peace and Justice Center ) in a move to help the budget . There where other areas of the City Departments facing loss of budget monies or a reduction in funding at the same time. The "Justice Center " went to court and argued that after so many years of continuous funding contributions by the city, that they where ' entitled " to the funding. And the lying liberal Judge agreed and forced the city to restore funding to them . The rest of the Departments couldn't go and sue the City for a restoration of funds. So the Mexican fags got to stick it to the taxpayers and didn't even offer a reach around. Lots like woomby does on here !

Just like in Highland Park, JL?

Houston cut a deal with the Woodlands to not annex them and the Woodlands would not incorporate or something like that. City wanted the tax base bad, but could not really afford to offer up city services. I think the city also had to give up any extraterritorial claims. I could be wrong as it has been a few years since they make their agreement.

Now Sly and She-jack will fuck the citizens in the ass with both hands in the citizens pockets.

Are you saying conservatives do not own 500k plus homes in Houston? No Mexican or Asians or AA"s either? Originally Posted by WTF

I just want to catch the liberals in the net, and dampen demand for large houses and the need for illegals to build them. Everything else is acceptable collateral damage if liberals have to pay their fair share.
Actually, I'm proposing a surtax on environmentally unfriendly large homes in the spirit of the Paris accords - just like we need a surtax on private jets and limousines and yachts.

Don't feel alone over there in Houston. The lying liberals here in San Antonio are afflicted with the same " spread the tax base, annex all we can, then tax and spend till the constituents limp ! " syndrome. These idiot liberal hicks were even sued a few years back for eliminating a liberal Hispanic gay rights organization's funding ( Esperanza Peace and Justice Center ) in a move to help the budget . There where other areas of the City Departments facing loss of budget monies or a reduction in funding at the same time. The "Justice Center " went to court and argued that after so many years of continuous funding contributions by the city, that they where ' entitled " to the funding. And the lying liberal Judge agreed and forced the city to restore funding to them . The rest of the Departments couldn't go and sue the City for a restoration of funds. So the Mexican fags got to stick it to the taxpayers and didn't even offer a reach around. Lots like woomby does on here ! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

Those Mexican fags are a menace, to be sure!!

Those Mexican fags are a menace, to be sure!! Originally Posted by DSK

Homophobic racist.

Yeh, but for some of the greedy Demagogues who tend to run big city Governments, "extraterritorial jurisdiction" could be anything between Houston and Dallas.

The only way they can keep the coffers filled is to keep chasing the tax base. Originally Posted by Jackie S

Actually not.

The lying liberals here in San Antonio are afflicted with the same " spread the tax base, annex all we can, ... Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

Houston has it's "fair share" of small incorporated pockets of resistance.

The tactical method of eliminating the "encroachment" is incorporation, which takes some farsighted decision making.

There was legislation (have to look it up) requiring a vote by the occupants/landowners of the area to be annexed to approve the "consumption" and the vote was required to allow annexation. I don't recall if it passed or it was subsequently repealed or modified.

The last time we had a black mayor the "Stress Clinics" flourished. The Mayor even had his own handle on aspd and attended the socials.

Downtown Brown.


Those were the good old days.

The last time we had a black mayor the "Stress Clinics" flourished. The Mayor even had his own handle on aspd and attended the socials.

Downtown Brown.


Those were the good old days. Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

That was before the Feminist aligned with the Evangelicals and brought us the big all sex workers are Human Trafficking victims, lie.


.

That was before the Feminist aligned with the Evangelicals and brought us the big all sex workers are Human Trafficking victims, lie. Originally Posted by WTF

That's your story and you're sticking to it, right?

The "Feminist" and "Evangelicals" are not funding the grants for "Trafficking"!

Do some digging. They talk shit, but that's free hot air.

That's your story and you're sticking to it, right?

The "Feminist" and "Evangelicals" are not funding the grants for "Trafficking"!

Do some digging. They talk shit, but that's free hot air. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Jesus...the funds are coming from the Feds. The Feminist and the Evangelicals were the ones behind the overblowing of the sex trafficking bs. They have joined forces. According to these groups everyone in the sex industry is trafficked.

Politicians saw it as a way to funnel money to Police Departments..

Our Senator from Texas is one on the main alarmist.

Jesus...the funds are coming from the Feds. Originally Posted by WTF

Once you do a little research into the funneling of money, processing of grants, and the "grant oversight" that involves reviewing the "activity" that justifies the grant and the renewal of the grant for this next fiscal year, rather than political/social/hooker board blather in which you regularly engage, you will realize that LE grants come from the Department of Justice. The Administration!

That was before the Feminist aligned with the Evangelicals and brought us the big all sex workers are Human Trafficking victims, lie.
Originally Posted by WTF

Unfortunately, it is a powerful coalition that loves that false narrative and is going to stick to it for awhile, facts to the contrary notwithstanding. Soon as the Super Bowl hits, then we get to hear about the 100,000 sex workers coming to town again, some high number of them [prohibited topics].

Once you do a little research into the funneling of money, processing of grants, and the "grant oversight" that involves reviewing the "activity" that justifies the grant and the renewal of the grant for this next fiscal year, rather than political/social/hooker board blather in which you regularly engage, you will realize that LE grants come from the Department of Justice. The Administration! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Jesus again.....they would get nothing if the lies of both the right leaning Evangelicals and left leaning Feminist were not believed. Also how about you do a research on John Cornyn Human Trafficking law. It was signed in May of this year.