right wing economics

Somewhat true. One couple simply wanted to retire in their early 50s and could not do so in the U.S. based on their income. None of the couples I know would be considered overly wealthy by most standards. As you said, they determined that based on their lifestyles retiring outside the U.S. would benefit them the most. And it didn't matter if the country where they ultimately decided to live was somewhat more socialistic than the U.S.

But they did "flee" the U.S. to seek a better future for themselves. Whether one equates that to fleeing a capitalistic country for a more socialistic country is open to opinion. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Thank you for the reasoned reply. I can see where you could consider it "fleeing" as well, even though I don't consider it to that level, but more of a calulated approach to their retirement.

Most Loons, like you, Originally Posted by LexusLover

Have you not read Ms Steele's new directive to stop calling other posters names.

Or are you immune from such moderation?

a few "Native" Americans may have, but that whole theory is about as solid as the big bang theory.. meaning extremely flimsy. in my view. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

The operative words: "in my view" ....

... Bill Clinton didn't know about DNA either!

Thank you for the reasoned reply. I can see where you could consider it "fleeing" as well, even though I don't consider it to that level, but more of a calulated approach to their retirement. Originally Posted by eccielover

Having visited with some of the Canadians living in Mexico it was almost a consensus that their flight was due to the cost of living, which was mostly due to the substandard health care in Canada based on what they could afford ... ala ... the Canadian version of the ACA that everyone was bragging about when Obaminable was selling his snake oil to the one-payee crowd.

And there weren't getting "socialized medicine" in Mexico .... or any other "socialistic" benefits. So connecting the migration South to any "socialistic politics" is ridiculous.

Interestingly enough the "Nazis Party" was formerly entitled ....

National Socialist German Workers' Party
(Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei,

Since the Republic of Mexico had a treaty with Nazis Germany during WWII and the country was a "haven" for fleeing Nazis to avoid prosecution and persecution post WWII it is worthy of evaluating the significance of any "socialist" claims in those countries south of our borders.

Having visited with some of the Canadians living in Mexico it was almost a consensus that their flight was due to the cost of living, which was mostly due to the substandard health care in Canada based on what they could afford ... ala ... the Canadian version of the ACA that everyone was bragging about when Obaminable was selling his snake oil to the one-payee crowd.

And there weren't getting "socialized medicine" in Mexico .... or any other "socialistic" benefits. So connecting the migration South to any "socialistic politics" is ridiculous.

Interestingly enough the "Nazis Party" was formerly entitled ....



Since the Republic of Mexico had a treaty with Nazis Germany during WWII and the country was a "haven" for fleeing Nazis to avoid prosecution and persecution post WWII it is worthy of evaluating the significance of any "socialist" claims in those countries south of our borders. Originally Posted by LexusLover

This post is full of more nonsense than a gay "lawyer" posting about the pussy he gets on a hooker board.

Not saying there is anything wrong with a cover story that stupid...

Btw...the Nazi's were not socialist. But anyone with have a brain would know that. I'm assuming you have more than half a brain. My condolences if not.

And you're just plain full of shit as to the main reason Canadians migrate to Mexico. I'll give you a hint...number one is WEATHER

You are probably not old enough or informed enough to recall the "Nationalization" of banks in Mexico .... the coastal properties and U.S. dollar accounts of U.S. citizens were confiscated ... by the government in the takeover .... as the Mexicans followed that move with an artificial devaluation of the Peso, which went from 12.5 per dollar to 150 per dollar overnight ... 2-3 days with U.S. dollar accounts frozen.

Guess what ... vote for one of the Loons if you like that tactic. Originally Posted by LexusLover

when did that happen?

a few "Native" Americans may have, but that whole theory is about as solid as the big bang theory.. meaning extremely flimsy. in my view.

Trump has effectively given away trillions, it just goes down as deficit spending for various items, like the military and tax cuts for the wealthy. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

Well, there goes your credibility...tax cuts for the wealthy? I got a tax cut and I'm far from wealthy. My income also went up 17.2% this year based on my W2.

Most people move because of cost of living and not social benefits. That has nothing to do with socialism. I always thought about retiring to PI. You can live pretty good on 600 dollars a month and lots of young, brown girls.

Well, there goes your credibility...tax cuts for the wealthy? I got a tax cut and I'm far from wealthy. My income also went up 17.2% this year based on my W2.

Most people move because of cost of living and not social benefits. That has nothing to do with socialism. I always thought about retiring to PI. You can live pretty good on 600 dollars a month and lots of young, brown girls. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

there's a downside. PI gets hit by typhoons regularly.

Well, there goes your credibility...tax cuts for the wealthy? . Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

The majority of the cuts went to businesses and the wealthy.

Just because you got a couple pennies back don't mean you recieved a significant tax break.

I always thought about retiring to PI. You can live pretty good on 600 dollars a month and lots of young, brown girls. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

600 dollars a month!!!

You'll be living with a gay man taking turns sucking dick if you think 600 bucks a month will do you.

600 dollars a month!!!

You'll be living with a gay man taking turns sucking dick if you think 600 bucks a month will do you. Originally Posted by WTF

thats your MO WTF

thats your MO WTF Originally Posted by Hotrod511

I'm not the one claiming you can live comfy on 600 bucks a month...

I don’t give a shit what some left wing socialist “economist” thinks.

Under President Trump, my business is doing better than it ever has. The men who work at my business are making more. Their families are living better.

Of course, this all involves getting up , going to work, and being a productive citizen, something the Progressive/Socialist/Liberal/Democrats find difficult to comprehend.

+1 - JS

The majority of the cuts went to businesses and the wealthy.

Just because you got a couple pennies back don't mean you recieved a significant tax break. Originally Posted by WTF

600 dollars a month!!!

You'll be living with a gay man taking turns sucking dick if you think 600 bucks a month will do you. Originally Posted by WTF

I guess I don't need to respond, LOL.. I couldn't top these if I did.