OK, so what now, scholars?
Hang him?
from the WSJFascinating that you cite something that directly refutes your earlier bogus posts in this thread, CBJ7. And since the courts have ruled Odumbo's appointments were in fact "unconstitutional", the court agreed with the plaintiffs, and not you, CBJ7. The Senate makes its own rules, not Odumbo, CBJ7, and the court ruled that the Senate was in "session" according to its own rules.
The court case turned on whether the Senate was in recess when Mr. Obama made the appointments during a holiday break early last year. The Constitution allows a president to unilaterally install nominees to positions that normally require Senate confirmation when the Senate is in recess.
But Republican lawmakers held minutes-long meetings every few days, and lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that meant the chamber was technically in session. While the plaintiff's case centered on those sessions, the court went a step further, declaring that Mr. Obama's appointments fell outside the bounds of his authority. Originally Posted by CJ7
You, sir, are an imbecile. and an asshole. No wonder you were voted...You're the dumb-ass golem fuck that started the poll that got your dumb golem ass elected:
IBSYNDROME of the Year! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider