On the other hand Air France flight 447 of 1 June 1999 crashed into the Atlantic, it had a huge search zone because it never broadcast a distress signal, it was out of the ATC live zone after leaving Brazilian airspace control and never reported back in, and they found plenty of debris, and it only took 5 days. It took 2 years to locate the black boxes 2.5 miles under the water, but they did find them. I suppose we will know in a few days, possibly? (9-11)
As for Amelia Earhart, some believed she lived on secretly as Irene Bolam, though I'm not one of those who believe it, but she was never found, was she?
Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer
Stop sending me PMs asking me to comment on your idiot posts. Despite that obnoxious request, I will - if only to stop you from thinking you wrote something intelligent.
Was there a point to your statements above? Apparently the Air France jet hit the water hard and shattered and left a lot of floating debris? What does that have to do with the Malaysian flight?
What if the Malaysian flight belly landed on the Pacific and stayed relatively intact, like the plane that landed in the Hudson river? Then it would sink slowly without a trace. You don't know what the crash was like, so how can you compare them?
Also, despite what you wrote, the Air France jet was relatively easy to find. It went into a stall, but it had stayed in its flight path. So the searchers only had to search along the flight path to find debris. In the case of the Malaysian jet, the plane went far off its flight path to somewhere completely unknown. So they don't even know where to begin searching.
Different crash, different circumstances, different results. Did you not understand my point about the Edmund Fitzgerald?
And what the fuck was your point about the Amelia Earhardt?