dim-retard Congress woman cheated on her female-threesome staffer with her male staffer

WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 10-27-2019, 06:42 PM
Oh, poor abused WTF
If DPST's behaved with a modicum of respect toward others - they might earn some respect.

BUTT NO!!!!!
Keep poppin off - and Join the Band! Originally Posted by oeb11
I how as much respect as given individually.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 10-27-2019, 06:46 PM






Are you insinuating that a dim-retard Congress woman is conspicuously breaking Federal laws? And can you confirm that you were there to authenticate such? Originally Posted by I B Hankering
I am insinuating that the photo you posted does not meet eccie photo standards...




Topless images, including nipples, and below the waist nudity is not allowed. Thongs, bikini bottoms, etc. are required. No exposed anus or exposed genitalia. No exceptions, even if nothing is exposed, there needs to be some sort of garment worn (e.g., underwear, bikini, thong, etc.). Butt cheeks are welcome. Additionally, images where the subject is wearing something below the waist, but still leave genitalia, the anus, or pubic hair partially exposed are not allowed. Clothing that clings to the genital region or clothing that is somewhat transparent is permitted. Common examples of what is not acceptable are nude shower photos where the lady is covered in bubbles or nude pictures of the lady kneeling even where the genital region is concealed, a garment must be worn and visible.
Unique_Carpenter's Avatar
The LA Times has a copy of her resignation letter.

https://www.latimes.com/california/s...s-amid-scandal
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 10-27-2019, 06:53 PM
The LA Times has a copy of her resignation letter.

https://www.latimes.com/california/s...s-amid-scandal Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter
There is no doubt in my mind that she should have resigned...but it was not because of the tattoo as IB implied.
  • Tiny
  • 10-27-2019, 06:58 PM
I’d hit it. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
I would have until I saw IB's photo. She looks better with her clothes on.
I B Hankering's Avatar
I am insinuating that the photo you posted does not meet eccie photo standards...

Topless images, including nipples, and below the waist nudity is not allowed. Thongs, bikini bottoms, etc. are required. No exposed anus or exposed genitalia. No exceptions, even if nothing is exposed, there needs to be some sort of garment worn (e.g., underwear, bikini, thong, etc.). Butt cheeks are welcome. Additionally, images where the subject is wearing something below the waist, but still leave genitalia, the anus, or pubic hair partially exposed are not allowed. Clothing that clings to the genital region or clothing that is somewhat transparent is permitted. Common examples of what is not acceptable are nude shower photos where the lady is covered in bubbles or nude pictures of the lady kneeling even where the genital region is concealed, a garment must be worn and visible.
Today 06:42 PM
Originally Posted by WTF
The nudity you are complaining was entirely blacked out, and your other complaint is founded on reckless speculation with no proof to back up your asinine assertions. But it is amusing to watch your attempt to twist reality to match your delusions.
I how as much respect as given individually. Originally Posted by WTF
And you bash Trumps letters as being Kardashian like.

Wtf is WTF trying to say in the above? Seems like an angry non coherent post. Like many of the left today. The anger and confusion remains palpable.

Didn't get to nail Trump this weekend and he comes out with a major victory against terrorists.

Poor babies don't know what to do, but cry about an image that has been blocked out for any actual nudity and surmise that the Congresswoman is engaged in (forbidden subject).

But when your down and out, you try to censor others who are kicking your ass.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 10-27-2019, 07:06 PM
The nudity you are complaining was entirely blacked out, and your other complaint is founded on reckless speculation with no proof to back up your asinine assertions. But it is amusing to watch your attempt to twist reality to match your delusions. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
What part of the blackened highlighted rule do you not understand?

Topless images, including nipples, and below the waist nudity is not allowed. Thongs, bikini bottoms, etc. are required. No exposed anus or exposed genitalia. No exceptions, even if nothing is exposed, there needs to be some sort of garment worn (e.g., underwear, bikini, thong, etc.). Butt cheeks are welcome. Additionally, images where the subject is wearing something below the waist, but still leave genitalia, the anus, or pubic hair partially exposed are not allowed. Clothing that clings to the genital region or clothing that is somewhat transparent is permitted. Common examples of what is not acceptable are nude shower photos where the lady is covered in bubbles or nude pictures of the lady kneeling even where the genital region is concealed, a garment must be worn and visible.




Gorilla nuts...or were they?
I B Hankering's Avatar
What part of the blackened highlighted rule do you not understand?

Topless images, including nipples, and below the waist nudity is not allowed. Thongs, bikini bottoms, etc. are required. No exposed anus or exposed genitalia. No exceptions, even if nothing is exposed, there needs to be some sort of garment worn (e.g., underwear, bikini, thong, etc.). Butt cheeks are welcome. Additionally, images where the subject is wearing something below the waist, but still leave genitalia, the anus, or pubic hair partially exposed are not allowed. Clothing that clings to the genital region or clothing that is somewhat transparent is permitted. Common examples of what is not acceptable are nude shower photos where the lady is covered in bubbles or nude pictures of the lady kneeling even where the genital region is concealed, a garment must be worn and visible.
Originally Posted by WTF
What part of "there was nothing exposed" do you not fucking understand? That damn picture was pre-censored to be published in a fucking newspaper, moron.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 10-27-2019, 07:13 PM
What part of "there was nothing exposed" do you not fucking understand? That damn picture was pre-censored to be published in a fucking newspaper, moron. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Last I checked eccie is not a newspaper....eccie rules explicitly state you can not post a nude picture below the waste no matter what you may claim.


and below the waist nudity is not allowed. Thongs, bikini bottoms, etc. are required. No exposed anus or exposed genitalia.No exceptions, even if nothing is exposed, there needs to be some sort of garment worn (e.g., underwear, bikini, thong, etc.).



I B Hankering's Avatar
Last I checked eccie is not a newspaper....eccie rules explicitly state you can not post a nude picture below the waste no matter what you may claim.

and below the waist nudity is not allowed. Thongs, bikini bottoms, etc. are required. No exposed anus or exposed genitalia.No exceptions, even if nothing is exposed, there needs to be some sort of garment worn (e.g., underwear, bikini, thong, etc.).
Originally Posted by WTF
NOTHING is fucking exposed, moron. Everything of concern is fucking BLACKED OUT as required by ECCIE! Your insistence otherwise is so much bullshit. But I do enjoy exposing your idiocy.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 10-27-2019, 07:24 PM
NOTHING is fucking exposed, moron. Everything of concern is fucking BLACKED OUT as required by ECCIE! Your insistence otherwise is so much bullshit. But I do enjoy exposing your idiocy. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Was there a garment on the congresswoman?

and below the waist nudity is not allowed. Thongs, bikini bottoms, etc. are required. No exposed anus or exposed genitalia.No exceptions, even if nothing is exposed, there needs to be some sort of garment worn (e.g., underwear, bikini, thong, etc.).



Gorilla nuts...or were they? Originally Posted by WTF
Your whining certainly sounds a whole lot more like sour grape nuts than Gorilla nuts. Maybe you need to grow a pair.
I B Hankering's Avatar
Was there a garment on the congresswoman?

and below the waist nudity is not allowed. Thongs, bikini bottoms, etc. are required. No exposed anus or exposed genitalia.No exceptions, even if nothing is exposed, there needs to be some sort of garment worn (e.g., underwear, bikini, thong, etc.
Originally Posted by WTF
The "garment" is an impenetrable mask of black printer's ink.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 10-27-2019, 07:34 PM
The "garment" is an impenetrable mask of black printer's ink. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
That is not garment


garment

[ˈɡärmənt]



NOUN

garments (plural noun)
  1. an item of clothing.
    "a windproof outer garment" · [more]
    "fashion garments"

    synonyms:
    item of clothing · article of clothing · item of dress




and below the waist nudity is not allowed. Thongs, bikini bottoms, etc. are required. No exposed anus or exposed genitalia.No exceptions, even if nothing is exposed, there needs to be some sort of garment worn (e.g., underwear, bikini, thong, etc