and aren't liberals (democrats) complaining about the so-called "war on women" also talking about women's reproductive systems? The same goes for atheists filing law suits to remove crosses from sites that they have been sitting for years. Your heroes are doing exactly what you're complaining about but from the opposite point of view. Originally Posted by JD BarleycornYes, but libs are on the right side of the war on women and the law, as far as getting the majority of the votes. It's a winning position for them since most women want the right to choose.
Yes, but libs are on the right side of the war on women and the law, as far as getting the majority of the votes. It's a winning position for them since most women want the right to choose.So you think this fake "war on women" is all about abortion. I would think that women would be interested in equal pay, equal rights, respect, and being individuals. Then again Alan Grayson abuses his wife, the Kennedy's believe it is their right to cheat and lie on their wives, Gary Condit cheated on his wife and then hid his involvement with Chandra Levi with they were looking for her, who can forget Filthy Filner of San Diego, Anthony "check out my junk" Wiener, maybe you should get a cigar from Bill Clinton (put a condom on it since you don't know where's been), or ask the women who've lost their jobs due to Obamacare, the...you get the idea. If there is a war on women then the democrats are the enemy.
You do not know God if you think he needs or wants a bunch of fucking politicians and parrots making him part of a political campaign. For myself, it is gross and detesting to even have God and politicians in the same sentence, much less when it is a Repub claiming God wanted you to be raped so you need to keep that bastard child because I am his messenger! You have it wrong, go back to Sunday school and start back over, in your mind, you have warped God in to something he is not and should not be, a Republican talking point. Originally Posted by nwarounder
Bitch at the local reporters... Originally Posted by i'va biggenBitch at the Washington Post, Ekim the Inbred Chimp:
"Sink, when she unsuccessfully sought the governorship in 2010, won the congressional district even while losing the state."http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...ay-to-victory/
Bitch at the Washington Post, Ekim the Inbred Chimp:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...ay-to-victory/ Originally Posted by I B Hankering
That's right, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, you deflect for and defend lying dim-retards while you lyingly claim you're an Independent! Originally Posted by I B HankeringMy God you are a stupid fuck I am not defending anyone just passing on what a local reporter in the area gave for her loss. Just because it doesn't jibe with your pet report you start your shit again. If there is a lying dim-a-tard it is you. Fucking In Bred piss ant.
My God you are a stupid fuck I am not defending anyone just passing on what a local reporter in the area gave for her loss. Just because it doesn't jibe with your pet report you start your shit again. If there is a lying dim-a-tard it is you. Fucking In Bred piss ant. Originally Posted by i'va biggenThat "theory" doesn't hold water considering how Sink carried that district in a previous election when Odumbocare wasn't the primary issue, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. Keep deflecting, you Odumbotron.