.....
When I see titles like " OMGGGGGGG THE WORLDS MOST GORRGEPUS WOMAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! " (long title, all caps, extravagance) I tend to get skeptical especial when the reviewer has patterns of it, BUTT, thats just ME.
As for activities, of course even with ROS one couldn't tell
Originally Posted by Eva Damita
Believe it or not, a title like that may mean that is what the guy's opinion of the provider is, and he has every right to do so, after all, it is his review and the only opinion that counts in it is his. If he has several reviews that have the same title, of the provider being most gorgeous, then obviously, they all cannot be the same in the looks department, but he can have the opinion that each one is gorgeous to him. Or they may just be that hyped up about their experience with that provider, nothing wrong with that at all.
Back to the OP original subject of exaggeration, the ones that I question and have a problem with are when some guys also do that kind of format in the title of their reviews for the only purpose of drawing attention to themselves and/or to bait business in the door for the provider. Those reviews are not only exaggerated in the title, but also in activities reported the ROS body of the review. Usually, those reviews are written by the pimps, owners of studios to get their business up and running at the start, the WK friends of the provider at her request or even providers themselves when they are starting out or have not had any reviews in a while.