FOR SEE3772 AND ALL THE 9/11 TRUTHER MORONS

COG - If you are a JD or lawyer, which side has the "burden of proof" here? The 9/11 commission digested and summarized a ton of evidence for its conclusions. You start by assuming there must be a conspiracy - unless it is disproven. Even when Popular Mechanics meets you on your own terms by starting with each conspiracy theory and presenting facts to debunk it, you dismiss them as "lackeys".

Popular Mechanics rubber stamped the NIST report. Not good enough. The burden of proof is on the government to explain in detail why it is necessary to radically curtail our fundamental rights. No question there. The only way to do that is an independent, comprehensive, public investigation.

But keep believing the government. They depend on you.

Popular Mechanics rubber stamped the NIST report. Not good enough. The burden of proof is on the government to explain in detail why it is necessary to radically curtail our fundamental rights. No question there. The only way to do that is an independent, comprehensive, public investigation.

But keep believing the government. They depend on you. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

PM didn't rubber stamp anything expect your head as being empty of brains.
They DEBUNKED all the crap you want desperately to believe. that was the real purpose of the PM documentary .. to prove what an idiot COG is. and they succeeded.

here's a recent portrait of Cute Old Goat




isn't he soooo cute?

Saudi Arabians make sure the planes fly into buildings. Israelis make sure those buildings fall neatly into dust, and USA beats up Afghanistan for laughing. Hey Iraq, wtf U lookin at?!?! Kaboom!

9/11 is old hat. Flat Earth is totally back in style!

Saudi Arabians make sure the planes fly into buildings. Israelis make sure those buildings fall neatly into dust, and USA beats up Afghanistan for laughing. Hey Iraq, wtf U lookin at?!?! Kaboom!

9/11 is old hat. Flat Earth is totally back in style! Originally Posted by Koontz

Well we know the Earth isn't flat. That's been proven time and time again. We also know through the use of Physics that an Airplane made out of Aluminum isn't going to disappear into the interior of a Building made out of thick concrete, hardened steel beams and other supporting materials made of steel. An Airplane the size of a 767 has over 300,000 parts there should have been large sections of that plane on the ground. There wasn't, I can't imagine that plane and that building had such unique properties as to defy the laws of physics.

Jim