BUT BUT BUT what if that nice man had claimed he was just "exressing himself" artistically??
Who are you to judge that his "expression" wasn't "art"?????
Originally Posted by Sweet Heather
He didn't tell me. And I wasn't judging. He just scared me and I was very startled.
Hey, I like you but if you wish to get into an pissing contest, I'm all for it. Besides, I need to get my mind out of the gutter while thinking of monks.
Lenny Bruce once said, "There is a difference between porn with a little art in it and art with a little bit of porn". YOUR argument, Heather, just doesn't make sense.
This lady had a film crew and was doing her thing in downtown Dallas and well, it is what it is. My guy jumped in front of me while I was washing my vehicle in a skanky part of town, scared the living crap out of me, pulled apart his coat like right out of a bad B-movie and ran away. Totally different. But if you wish to argue that what this guy did to me over twenty years ago was art? Go for it.
Personally, I believe that you're just pulling poor punches because someone questioned what you wrote and now, you're just feeling a little snippy.
Hope you feel better now.
Elisabeth
P.S. And what in the hell difference does it make whether "art" is represented, or created, by someone who is fat, or disfigured or what? Is "art" ONLY art if presented in only a fashion that you, personally, approve of? Just curious. With a slight segue, you might find interesting the art of Robert Mapplethorpe.