Slick Willie is at it again!

I don't know why IB but I always have a problem with your youtube posts, they just appear as some solid black field without any aperture Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QXN...ature=youtu.be

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QXN...ature=youtu.be Originally Posted by I B Hankering

there ya go, thanks

What I find baffling is that some people continue to scream about Clinton’s sexual behavior every day but pretend that Trump’s abusive behavior is non existent.

Clinton got a blowjob. Trump walked in on naked beauty pageant contestants.

If sleaze bothers you.... Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Yes it's ironic. And as Old-T points out, this is a hooker board to boot.

I get a little nostalgic thinking about Bill Clinton. Not his first term, when he fucked up some of the great things accomplished by Ronald Reagan. But his second term, when Republicans controlled Congress. Clinton and the Republicans balanced the budget, reformed the welfare system, cut the capital gains tax, and promoted free trade. The nation did well.

And, Bill Clinton, I feel your pain. The leader of the free world forced to solicit blow jobs from an overweight intern, because he's closeted in the office of the Presidency with a wife who probably wouldn't put out. We should view him with compassion, not condemnation.

Yes it's ironic. And as Old-T points out, this is a hooker board to boot.

I get a little nostalgic thinking about Bill Clinton. Not his first term, when he fucked up some of the great things accomplished by Ronald Reagan. But his second term, when Republicans controlled Congress. Clinton and the Republicans balanced the budget, reformed the welfare system, cut the capital gains tax, and promoted free trade. The nation did well.

And, Bill Clinton, I feel your pain. The leader of the free world forced to solicit blow jobs from an overweight intern, because he's closeted in the office of the Presidency with a wife who probably wouldn't put out. We should view him with compassion, not condemnation. Originally Posted by Tiny

some of your post has sense and is ok

however the glaring lacuna in your post is the omission of clinton's attacks on women, which I don't see as worthy of compassion

these attacks, deservingly, keep him mired in disdain and subject to continued ridicule

and this is his doing, while hellary's fraudulent theatrics claiming universal sisterhood is her own deceit

... Clinton and the Republicans balanced the budget, reformed the welfare system, cut the capital gains tax, and promoted free trade. The nation did well. Originally Posted by Tiny

A problem. Clinton didn't pay the bills, so he had "a surplus"!

And in the Spring of 2000 the crash began, but he and Gore lied about it....while the BLS cooked the employment books for them in an effort to help Gore over the top in the Fall of 2000.

All the while the 911 attackers were strategizing and emplementing, while Bill was killing goats in the desert and destroying milk factories with missile lobs.

however the glaring lacuna in your post is the omission of clinton's attacks on women, which I don't see as worthy of compassion

these attacks, deservingly, keep him mired in disdain and subject to continued ridicule Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

Fair point. Why wouldn't you say the same about Trump?

https://www.cnn.com/2016/10/14/polit...ers/index.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald...ct_allegations

A problem. Clinton didn't pay the bills, so he had "a surplus"!

And in the Spring of 2000 the crash began, but he and Gore lied about it....while the BLS cooked the employment books for them in an effort to help Gore over the top in the Fall of 2000.

All the while the 911 attackers were strategizing and emplementing, while Bill was killing goats in the desert and destroying milk factories with missile lobs. Originally Posted by LexusLover

AND, not to forget, Ole WILLY was trying to figure out what the definition of " IS " is ! AND, his SECOND utterance of the FAMOUS Slick Willy line of " I did NOT..." didn't pan out as well as the first ( I did NOT inhale ! ).

More Saturday morning comics.....

Here's a quarter ... 2 of them ... to call someone who cares.

This board is supposedly anonymous. It would be ok if Bill were!

The Clintons are not relevant any more. They lost their final bid. Originally Posted by LexusLover

I think it is IB you need to send those quarters to. My whole point was the hypocrisy (and dullnes to be honest) of HIM starting this point. Yes, they are irrelevant and hopefully stay that way, but as usual IB keeps flogging away. This time without even the shred of justification he may have had when they were relevant.

Agreed.

But you’d never know that to read this board every day. In fact, you might even think some people around here are still obsessed with the 80s power couple.

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

No, say it ain't so!

Lighten up. This isn't just "another man." Originally Posted by gnadfly

And what does that have to do with the point? You would be surprised what men have accounts on here.

There's nothing hypocritical about declaiming a slimy politician who saw to it that his side piece was funded by taxpayer dollars and whose illicit rendezvous were held in the rooms of a taxpayer built and maintained building -- one of this country's most prestigious buildings. Any other Federal supervisor caught having sex with a subordinate hireling would have been summarily fired for violating Federal regulations about work place fraternization: not perpetually defended by a miscreant crowd of hypocritical Lefties. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Those items have some merit. But that is not what was happening here, was it? Rant away that he got away with things decades ago, fine, beat your head against the wall. But as you often do you can't seem to separate things that are not the same.

As to the second part, you are truly clueless. The last 50 years are filled with Dems and Reps who did just that and nothing bad happened to them. Start with a fine Rep president in the '50s. A Dem one in the 60s. Run all the way through the "fine upstanding Texan, Gen Joe Ashey" who would have made Clinton look celibate. Cabinet Secretaries, Congressmen, and pleanty of other high level 1st, 2nd, and 3rd level supervisors.


There was one Congressman who people knew to NEVER try and schedule an early AM appointment with on certain days because he had a standing private meeting with a certain page. Another highest level SES whose "executive secretary" went on all his trips but had only one skill she was good at.

Oh, and several people of that ilk found their admin assistants from ads on THIS website (actually not quite true, it was ASPD) It was a favorite hiring site for a group of Good Ol' Boys from TX & LA for a few years. I actually had spent time with two ladies in TX, and later ran into them in DC after they "retired" from escorting and showed up with a job in a couple "someone important"'s personal entourages. On gov't salary, with lots of travel perqs. (Two different men, two different political views, but obviously similar beliefs about what they need from a pretty young admin.)

A different one who was one of my favorites stayed with me for a few days while she was house hunting in DC.

So, as is often the case, your vision is a bit less than 20/20.

What I want to know is this. If Monica Lewinsky had a banging body, if she hadn't been chubby, would Bill Clinton have fucked her, instead of just asking for blow jobs?

I think it is IB you need to send those quarters to. My whole point was the hypocrisy Originally Posted by Old-T

And that is why the quarters were directed toward you.

There is no "equivalency" with this Board and a POTUS in the White House for their to be a claim of hypocrisy. You are on this board?

As for the latter observation, how would you KNOW what "men" are on this board in so far as their identities are concerned?

Those items have some merit. But that is not what was happening here, was it? Rant away that he got away with things decades ago, fine, beat your head against the wall. But as you often do you can't seem to separate things that are not the same.

As to the second part, you are truly clueless. The last 50 years are filled with Dems and Reps who did just that and nothing bad happened to them. Start with a fine Rep president in the '50s. A Dem one in the 60s. Run all the way through the "fine upstanding Texan, Gen Joe Ashey" who would have made Clinton look celibate. Cabinet Secretaries, Congressmen, and pleanty of other high level 1st, 2nd, and 3rd level supervisors.

There was one Congressman who people knew to NEVER try and schedule an early AM appointment with on certain days because he had a standing private meeting with a certain page. Another highest level SES whose "executive secretary" went on all his trips but had only one skill she was good at.

Oh, and several people of that ilk found their admin assistants from ads on THIS website (actually not quite true, it was ASPD) It was a favorite hiring site for a group of Good Ol' Boys from TX & LA for a few years. I actually had spent time with two ladies in TX, and later ran into them in DC after they "retired" from escorting and showed up with a job in a couple "someone important"'s personal entourages. On gov't salary, with lots of travel perqs. (Two different men, two different political views, but obviously similar beliefs about what they need from a pretty young admin.)

A different one who was one of my favorites stayed with me for a few days while she was house hunting in DC.

So, as is often the case, your vision is a bit less than 20/20. Originally Posted by Old-T

A person with 20/20 vision can easily see that what's missing in your post is any substantive repudiation of the fact that Slick Willie put this woman on the payroll at taxpayer expense to be his side-piece for an occasional romp in the Oval Office in White House -- also paid for by the American taxpayers.

ASPD catered to men paying independent women -- not women (subordinate employees) they supervised -- with their own money for entertainment at spots not as estimable as the taxpayer supported Oval Office in the White House.

So now the conversation is about Clinton vs ECCIE member.

How do you know any of this? Your accusations against Clinton — especially as they pertain to his affair with Monica Lewinsky — have grown in legend over the years and I wonder how much of them are actually based in fact anymore.

So now you’re claiming he put this woman on the payroll for that specific reason? Really?

What else? This was always an insidious plot to get taxpayers to buy him pussy?

Wow! Though admittedly what aboutism, I have to wonder while you’re still whining about Clinton getting a blowjob from an intern the day after Trump royally fucked thousands of federal employees as well as millions of refugees.

Just checking.

John is pissed!