While the left was out celebrating gay marriage, Obamacare, and banning the Confederate flag

The fucker is charged with a hate crime.

What is your point?

COIdiot control your woman! Originally Posted by shanm

Copying BigAss will not improve your image, or increase your intelligence. IJS.

COIdiot control your woman! Originally Posted by shanm

Copying BigAss will not improve your image, or increase your intelligence. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

COIdiot, this is my first post in this thread.

Please explain how you reached the conclusion that he is "copying" me, or STFU.

Hmmm, I wonder if this could possibly be another "wager" for you to run and hide from. (More on that later)

Since you brought the issue up, there is no doubt that if given a choice between the two, Shanm would much rather copy me as opposed to your stupid ass!

Of course, our resident Cowardly Idiot could always choose to STFU and mind his own business as opposed to everyone else's.

It should be noted that should you choose the STFU option, it is something every poster in the PF would greatly benefit from!

You're just another Cowardly Idiot!

Since you brought the issue up, there is no doubt that if given a choice between the two, Shanm would much rather copy me as opposed to your stupid ass!
Originally Posted by bigtex

On one hand, it would be extremely easy to copy COIdiot. I could spend my days typing simpleton responses or otherwise bitch and moan about everything from here to Shanghai.

On the other hand, I would never want to appear as stupid as COIdiot.

I think I would rather shoot myself in the head than copy COIdiot!

What is your fucking point? Originally Posted by timpage

Too stupid to get the OP's point? Maybe this will help....


Love Among the Ruins

Hurrah for gay marriage. But why do supporters save their vitriol for its foes instead of the barbarians at our gates?

By BARI WEISS
June 26, 2015 7:02 p.m. ET

On Friday my phone was blowing up with messages, asking if I’d seen the news. Some expressed disbelief at the headlines. Many said they were crying.

None of them were talking about the dozens of people gunned down in Sousse, Tunisia, by a man who, dressed as a tourist, had hidden his Kalashnikov inside a beach umbrella. Not one was crying over the beheading in a terrorist attack at a chemical factory near Lyon, France. The victim’s head was found on a pike near the factory, his body covered with Arabic inscriptions. And no Facebook friends mentioned the first suicide bombing in Kuwait in more than two decades, in which 27 people were murdered in one of the oldest Shiite mosques in the country.

They were talking about the only news that mattered: gay marriage.

Unlike President Obama, I have always been a staunch supporter of gay marriage, and I cheered the Supreme Court’s ruling making gay marriage legal in all 50 states. But as happy as I was, I was equally upset on Friday—and not just with the Islamists who carried out those savage attacks.

Moral relativism has become its own, perverse form of nativism among those who stake their identity on being universalist and progressive.

How else to explain the lack of outrage for the innocents murdered on the beach, while vitriol is heaped on those who express any shred of doubt about the Supreme Court ruling? How else to make sense of the legions of social-justice activists here at home who have nothing to say about countries where justice means flogging, beheading or stoning?

How else to understand those who have dedicated their lives to creating safe spaces for transgender people, yet issue no news releases about gender apartheid in an entire region of the world? How else to justify that at the gay-pride celebrations this weekend in Manhattan there is unlikely to be much mention of the gay men recently thrown off buildings in Syria and Iraq, their still-warm bodies desecrated by mobs?

It is increasingly eerie to live in this split-screen age. Earlier this week I received an email from a progressive Jewish organization about how Judaism teaches “that the preservation of human dignity is important enough to justify overriding our sacred mitzvot.” The rest of the email was about respecting dignity by using preferred gender pronouns.

On my other computer screen, I looked at a photograph of five men in orange jumpsuits, their legs bound. They were trapped like dogs inside a metal cage and hanging above a pool of water. They were drawing their final breaths before their Islamic State captors lowered the cage into the pool and they drowned together.

What was that about human dignity?

The barbarians are at our gates. But inside our offices, schools, churches, synagogues and homes, we are posting photos of rainbows on Twitter. It’s easier to Photoshop images of Justice Scalia as Voldemort than it is to stare evil in the face.

You can’t get married if you’re dead.


.

This is what I'm talking about. People are dying (being killed) by terrorists around the world and this thread goes down into a tit for tat pissing contest.

The former head of the CIA is warning that ISIS loves the symbolism of dates (the 4th of July), and is wanting to make a statement about their power (those limited air strikes are not doing the trick). Admiral Hayden also pointed out that all the major intelligence services in the US are giving out the same warning while at the same time, the White House is calling it business as usual. So....who do you believe? The professionals who work for Barack Obama indirectly or the White House spokes people who work directly for Barack Obama?

Yep,

http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/2015...gestures.html/

http://www.lex18.com/story/29390406/...eath-of-marine

http://cityofflintpd.blogspot.com/20...at-approx.html

Here is one they called a hate crime

http://conservative-headlines.com/20...led-2-injured/

Last year a man who was a known white power idiot killed 3 jewish people at a community center and old folks home, he is being charged with a hate crime still no president........ Mr. President don't white lives matter? Originally Posted by dirty dog

If you are talking about in KC, none killed were Jewish. You should write Obie and let him know your objection.

This is what I'm talking about. People are dying (being killed) by terrorists around the world and this thread goes down into a tit for tat pissing contest.

The former head of the CIA is warning that ISIS loves the symbolism of dates (the 4th of July), and is wanting to make a statement about their power (those limited air strikes are not doing the trick). Admiral Hayden also pointed out that all the major intelligence services in the US are giving out the same warning while at the same time, the White House is calling it business as usual. So....who do you believe? The professionals who work for Barack Obama indirectly or the White House spokes people who work directly for Barack Obama? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Other than ramping up security, what do you recommend judy?

The fucker is charged with a hate crime.

What is your point? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

My point is simple. The President attended the funeral of those killed in the Church shooting by a white man who is being charged with a hate crime. Yet and I ask this again when has this president attended the funeral of a white person killed during a hate crime or killed by a black man. That's the point and again I ask don't white lives matter.

If you are talking about in KC, none killed were Jewish. You should write Obie and let him know your objection. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

You asked I answered sir and you are write I misworded the statement as I should have said 3 people he thought were jewish.

You asked I answered sir and you are write I misworded the statement as I should have said 3 people he thought were jewish. Originally Posted by dirty dog

Check, the dumb fuck just shot at random thinking hr was shooting Jews.

Not exactly true. He shot people that he thought were probably Jewish as it was a community center for Jewish people. It was not random.

Not exactly true. He shot people that he thought were probably Jewish as it was a community center for Jewish people. It was not random. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

If someone is thinking of just shooting you it is not random, if they just find someone and shoot them it is random judy.

If someone is thinking of just shooting you it is not random, if they just find someone and shoot them it is random judy. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

So little eva, do you think Odumbo was correct when he described the four killings in a Jewish deli in Paris last January as "random"?

So little eva, do you think Odumbo was correct when he described the four killings in a Jewish deli in Paris last January as "random"? Originally Posted by lustylad

Lusty ass if someone does not have a designed target (like you ) then it is random. If you are going to target a pacific group or race the people in it may be random.