I wish we could just all be like the Manatees.They never harm anything. Originally Posted by Becky
A couple of decades back somewhere I recall reading a (seriousWell look what the cat dragged in.
scientific) paper claiming to show that cats have independent
instincts/appetites for stalking, chasing, pouncing, fighting, killing
and eating prey...roughly; I might have some details wrong. In
other words, their behavior is not due simply to the single motivation
of hunger. And, indeed, it is common to see overly well-fed house
cats going after small creatures with an energy and "enthusiasm"
that cannot be due to pure hunger.
Even more relevant perhaps, if you read field studies of the behavior
of "higher" (but what do they smoke?) primates, you will find plenty
of accounts of their shockingly human-like and clearly deliberate
cruelty to one another.
Perhaps the way in which our species is most unique is in the incredible
arrogance of thinking that we are unique among the species! ;-)
-Ww Originally Posted by Wwanderer
if evolution is a given fact....there can be no such thing as cruelty in man......inherently the word cruelty is a comparison to some other type of conduct and makes a judgement....man is man and any act is natural, or thats where evolution leads Originally Posted by nevergaveitathoughtI would say that the word (actually, concept of) cruelty is essentially normative rather than comparative. And if you are saying that the validity/truth of evolution somehow implies that judgements or moral/normative values are "impossible" or meaningless, I think that is a a debatable stance (to put it mildly)...a sort of reductionist fallacy, imo.