The forum thinks that you should not have access to the internet, you moronic buffoon. Originally Posted by gnadflySo you speak for the forum now....
As the mystic would say...Let's ask LexyLiar!
![](https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/jc/AAEAAQAAAAAAAAjSAAAAJDQ5MzFmMDRmLTQ3YzctNGZiNy05ZGEwLWY4MzkwNGRmNjZmMA.jpg)
What were the choices? It's kind of like this, If you went to an Ice Crème Parlor you don't like chocolate at all they have only two flavors Chocolate Fudge or Chocolate Chip, lol.That is not the point, I realize we had shitty choices....buy I'm not running around bragging about how good Trump is.
Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
That is not the point, I realize we had shitty choices....buy I'm not running around bragging about how good Trump is.There's only one way to handle a shitty choices, don't vote. I would take Trump's rudeness over Clinton's vindictiveness any day. Jim Webb would have made a better nominee than Clinton but I think he was too bold and manly for Liberals. For 2020 the rumor is the DNC will try propping up Michelle Obama or Oprah Winfrey so they can groom their token black so they can sling the Race Card around like they did with Barry, so they can continue to put White America on a guilt trip.
He was a shitty choice and he has not disappointed in living up to that.
Many of you though are bragging about how good a shitty choice he was.
That makes no fucking sense to me.
Basically you're saying , "He is our shitty choice!"Originally Posted by WTF
First of all how do you define Mentally Ill, and who determines someone is Mentally Ill and can't purchase a Fire Arm? Do you think a Firearms Dealer is qualified to make such a diagnoses?These are good questions and already have some state by state guidance and effectiveness.
Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
Don't believe it, if Hillary would've won he'd be defending Hillary. Again, WDF has no credibility. Just look at the number of people who call him a dumbass.No trap dipshit.
He likes it. Somehow he thinks "They've fallen into my trap." Originally Posted by gnadfly
These are good questions and already have some state by state guidance and effectiveness.Here's a realistic scenario that has happened I am sure. Guy has a great job, great wife and kids, lives in a nice house provides well for his family. He comes home early one afternoon and his wife is getting boned by some dude she met at the Mall or something. Husband goes postal gets gun and shoots both of them. Liberals would probably say " Oh I bet he had a history of Mental Illness" No, not necessarily a history ,but rather a moment. Which can happen to anyone. So the mental Health issue when it comes to firearm possession and ownership is very vague and difficult to define.
The problems with the Dims I've stated many times before is they want to put "everything on the table" when negotiating gun control. Right now on FB my "friends" have already reduced their arguments from "lets have a conversation" to "take all guns away from everyone" after only two days of not wanting to negotiate.
The gun control people's worst enemy is themselves.
Lets get the national background check database cleaned up and quickly updated. And proven cleaned up and updated.
Then we'll have a long conversation about what constitutes a mental illness, how it will be judged, who will judge it, the HIIPA ramifications and keeping crazy people from purchasing guns.
After that has been deemed effective we'll talk about how to use this as a criteria for taking away some people's guns.
But Dims really don't want to have this conversation. It's alot easier to take away people's guns and continue the bureaucratic incompetence and power grabs. Originally Posted by gnadfly