I'll say again, most providers have too much ego tied up in their pricing and justify it by describing how little they want to work. Live your life by what makes you happy.
Originally Posted by citizen44
No, you are reading it as such. What working girls want to do is make as much money as possible so they can have as much independence as possible. When a lady chooses this as a job or a career, they have to sell off too much to not reap the rewards of an incredible amount of leisure time and greater than average revenue than 75% of their social strata. There’s no ego to it.
I would caution though that a couple of the higher priced providers are starting to feel the financial impact that increasing age & weight have. Do you want to lay around the house all day during your peak beauty and health years, or do you want to make enough money now so that you can retire at 30?
Originally Posted by citizen44
This is just not true. You are greatly missing the point of elevated price points, and thinking about this strictly from a price sensitive, consumer’s view point. There is a DIRECT correlation between a lady’s hourly rate and how busy she stays. If a $300 lady is slow, she should raise rates or at least your minimum, e.g., $400 for 90 minutes minimum, if your looks will support it, to get out of the bulge in the bell curve. She WILL get busier because of her grandfathered clients, she will have less competition and the new, higher-end clientele, that place a higher value on her services, will come see her. She doesn’t even have to change a thing. Upping her rate / minimum does that for her. The idea of something being a luxury item simply because of the price point is a concept that is polar opposite concept of your overall thesis and price sensitive consuming, but, like it or not, it works. Neither concept is right or wrong. They both have their place. When I was working, I simply preferred to charge more and spend time with a gentlemen that placed a higher value on me with the added benefit of working less. That’s all.
Another factor in the idea of raising your rates and to generate more business is, I can guarantee you that ladies with the higher price points ($350 / hour and on up) sell far more multi-hour appointments than they do hourly appointments. First off, clients that pay the higher fees aren’t looking for a quickie. They are looking for an experience. They are looking for luxury not a blow and go. The experience with a pretty lady at the higher price points is social as well as private time. Time, I might add, that is being paid for.
It is much easier to gear up for one two to three hour encounter than it is to gear up for two or three one hour encounters. A three hour appointment is just that (not including travel and freshen up time.) Three, one hour appointments is MINIMUM of four hours. And that’s assuming they are back to back with a half hour in between.
I also see a lot of providers have a snobby attitude among themselves when saying they are low volume. Like somehow the providers who are working hard to pay for school or support kids are somehow lesser. You realize that even one client a week is 50 guys a year right? You think that's low volume in relation to what? You don't really think any of us guys buy that low volume description do you? Other providers are not your competition, time is.
Originally Posted by citizen44
No, that’s not what they said. They said they’d rather be fresh with a smile on their face rather than tired, worn out and pissy. It’s not a question of snobbery. It’s a question of what a lady can charge. If a lady can charge more per hour so she can work less and generate significantly more overall revenue than the market average, by all means she should. [/quote]
Caroline, my apology if you believe my commentary was specifically geared at you. Let me assure you it was not. If you re-read my post, I was talking hi/lo volume, not price.
Originally Posted by citizen44
You simply cannot separate volume and price. No one is going to book four appointments a day everyday at $350 and up unless she looks like Scarlet Johansson. And if she looked like Scarlet Johansson, she'd be charging upwards of $700 an hour and working once maybe twice a day. Price and volume go hand and hand.