Monica Lewinsky's COme Back !!

Strongest woman in the world? She allowed herself to be publicly humiliated not once, not twice, not even three times, but repeatedly. She hung onto a cheating scumbag just to hold onto political power.

Hillary Clinton is the antithesis of the "liberated" woman who is worthy of being admired as a female role model. She has made it crystal clear that no amount of pride or dignity is too great a sacrifice in order to achieve power. Hardly an example of strength that is worthy of admiration.

As for Monica Lewinsky, oh good God, the "oh woe is I, I was so abused by the media" got old over a decade ago. Why she is choosing to bring it up again is beyond me, but frankly I don't really care one way or another. Originally Posted by SinsOfTheFlesh

I couldn't agree with you more. In the long run Hillary would make a terrible president. It's all about her and no one else but her. The average American would not be a part of that equation. Lewinski saw an opportunity and took it. The Clinton's think they can do whatever they want. Well Lewinski showed that an average person can play that game too, lol. I hope her book makes the Clinton's cringe.


Jim

I like interacting with people who respect others opinions.


But i see some of you guys's Irrelevant Comments ...


Smh...

They give me the creeps.go figure.
I'd fuck a lady on the kill floor just to say I have. Rubber boots, hardhat flashlight, good to go. Originally Posted by thebuffmantraples

If she's a subordinate, its cause for termination and damages.

But since it's not your "dime," I suspect you don't care.

Monica was an "intern" and as such The President was her "superior."

The CEO can't fuck the secretary with impunity. That was the point initially.

The "second point" was he lied about it to the public and then under oath.

Had she not kept the evidence of his lie, ...
......................... the story might have ended differently for both of them.

And we probably wouldn't be extending this thread.

But i see some of you guys's Irrelevant Comments ... Originally Posted by ArabianGoddess

I'm trying to respect that opinion. It's difficult, though.

If she's a subordinate, its cause for termination and damages.

But since it's not your "dime," I suspect you don't care.

Monica was an "intern" and as such The President was her "superior."

The CEO can't fuck the secretary with impunity. That was the point initially.

The "second point" was he lied about it to the public and then under oath.

Had she not kept the evidence of his lie, ...
......................... the story might have ended differently for both of them.

And we probably wouldn't be extending this thread. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Obviously both parties benefited then. I'm sure it won't hurt either now. imho.
If Hillary has the support of woman, I believe its cause she knows/knew her SO's appetite,cause ladies relate to the conundrum. Does that make her weak or lesser in strength(just cause he was president he didn't have the ladies permission?). It was bills problem from his own doings.
So above all you said, the court laughed at the argument for the bj situation(ha), what else would be the moral dilemma for you!

So just cause Billy had his willy dillied the lady isn't strong, smart, or qualified?

Wonder what your face would look like if you found out she was good BCD after all is said and done?

I'm Still Confused on why she came back on TV after 20 years of her scandal and choose this time when Clinton is running for president

Is It A Smart Democrat Move to get Clinton All woman's Vote as they will Sympathize with her


Or A Republican's Move to remind the World of The CLinton Family's Scandal ?

Either Way Its In Clinton's Favor As Most Woman Think She's One Of The Strongest WOman In The World And Who knows If She Saved Her Marriage SHe MAy Manage To Save This Country From The Crisis Originally Posted by ArabianGoddess

I give you 100 to 1 odds Hellary's reply would be,......
Wait for it, wait for it,
*
********
************
***************
********************
************************
****************************
****************************** ***
****************************** *********
****************************** ***************
****************************** ****************************** **


"At this point, just what difference does it make ?"

Obviously both parties benefited then. I'm sure it won't hurt either now. imho. Originally Posted by thebuffmantraples

What are you "talking" about?

Monica "benefited" by sucking his dick and getting cum on her dress? Really?

"Quid Pro Quo" ... does that ring any bells "up there"?

What are you "talking" about?

Monica "benefited" by sucking his dick and getting cum on her dress? Really?

"Quid Pro Quo" ... does that ring any bells "up there"? Originally Posted by LexusLover

So, you think she didn't like the spotlight before? Right after? And now! No book, paid interviews, appearances, talk shows, was that a figment?
She didn't have the choice to be anonymous ever! Mofo please! Your misleading only you.

I just wish Monica's father would have had the guts to walk right up to Bill and knock the shit out of him.

It's amazing that the genuine Rock Star of the Democrat Party is a fucking reprobate.

I like interacting with people who respect others opinions.


But i see some of you guys's Irrelevant Comments ...


Smh... Originally Posted by ArabianGoddess

Whiffy posting yet another pic of his man crush..

Strongest woman in the world? She allowed herself to be publicly humiliated not once, not twice, not even three times, but repeatedly. She hung onto a cheating scumbag just to hold onto political power.

Hillary Clinton is the antithesis of the "liberated" woman who is worthy of being admired as a female role model. She has made it crystal clear that no amount of pride or dignity is too great a sacrifice in order to achieve power. Hardly an example of strength that is worthy of admiration.

As for Monica Lewinsky, oh good God, the "oh woe is I, I was so abused by the media" got old over a decade ago. Why she is choosing to bring it up again is beyond me, but frankly I don't really care one way or another. Originally Posted by SinsOfTheFlesh

I totally agree with you about Hillary: Professional Victim. She's unfit to run.

For some reason Monica hasn't been able to get paid off on the professional victim gig. She simply needs a job.

So, you think she didn't like the spotlight before? Right after? And now! No book, paid interviews, appearances, talk shows, was that a figment?
She didn't have the choice to be anonymous ever! Mofo please! Your misleading only you. Originally Posted by thebuffmantraples

Actually, I'm not misleading anyone.

You are unsuccessfully trying to justify the use of power, influence, and authority to get a piece of ass (or a blow job) from a person in a subordinate position. That is not the law, and wasn't when Clinton was getting his, and wasn't when he was doing the same thing in the Governor's Mansion in Arkansas.

The reason why he lied, is because he also knew "the law" and the "consequences." He was guilty. And the reason why he as disbarred, is because he lied under oath in a Federal lawsuit for his Arkansas escapades. He is a serial predator.

As for your offensive argument to the contrary .... There have been plenty of women who were raped (or otherwise brutalized) and "tell their story" of survival, make money off their book, and then make some more off movies. Your "thought" process gives the rapist a pass.

For some reason Monica hasn't been able to get paid off on the professional victim gig. She simply needs a job. Originally Posted by gnadfly

The Clinton's are too broke to "pay her off." Remember?

Actually, I'm not misleading anyone.

You are unsuccessfully trying to justify the use of power, influence, and authority to get a piece of ass (or a blow job) from a person in a subordinate position. That is not the law, and wasn't when Clinton was getting his, and wasn't when he was doing the same thing in the Governor's Mansion in Arkansas.

The reason why he lied, is because he also knew "the law" and the "consequences." He was guilty. And the reason why he as disbarred, is because he lied under oath in a Federal lawsuit for his Arkansas escapades. He is a serial predator.

As for your offensive argument to the contrary .... There have been plenty of women who were raped (or otherwise brutalized) and "tell their story" of survival, make money off their book, and then make some more off movies. Your "thought" process gives the rapist a pass. Originally Posted by LexusLover

+1 Well said!