250,000 illegal votes found in Arizona!!!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...-friday-video/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...-friday-video/ Originally Posted by bambino

The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is an American far-right fake news website. The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.

The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is an American far-right fake news website. The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories. Originally Posted by pfunkdenver

Says who? You? Prove what the article they posted is false? Have they’ve lost lawsuits like NYT, WAPO, CNN? I’m sure you regard those as credible yeah? That’s why you’re in a deep sleep. TGP isn’t far right, just the anti MSM. All you have is attacking the messenger, not the message. Predictable.

Where did you get 600,000? Originally Posted by bambino

From the video in the link you provided in post #25. Navarro is discussing the audit with Bannon. The chart shows the total of "Possible Illegal Votes" at 601,130.

The biggest category (305,701, or more than half) is titled "Absentee Ballots Cast That Were Requested Before & After Statutory Deadline". What does that mean? If the ballots were requested before the deadline, they may be valid. After the deadline, not.

The previous table, presumably from a day earlier in the audit, said the total of "Possible Illegal Votes" was 254,722. The biggest category had a different title - "Mail-In Ballots Cast By Voters Registered After the Registration Deadline" - and a nice round number of 150,000. If someone tried to add 150k names & addresses to the Maricopa County registration rolls after the deadline, I think it would have been noticed.

I'm all for strengthening voter integrity laws. But I want to see the fraud up close with my own eyes. We need to pinpoint exactly where it's coming from in order to stop it.

The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is an American far-right fake news website. The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories. Originally Posted by pfunkdenver

if you say so

explain this

gonna be the topic of my newest thread. the real racists in america

is this fake news?


Head-kicking attack in New York leaves Asian man, 61, in coma, sparks hate-crime investigation

https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...w-york-harlem/


the suspect is black. explain that in non-racist terms. we'll wait.

Says who? You? Prove what the article they posted is false? Have they’ve lost lawsuits like NYT, WAPO, CNN? I’m sure you regard those as credible yeah? That’s why you’re in a deep sleep. TGP isn’t far right, just the anti MSM. All you have is attacking the messenger, not the message. Predictable. Originally Posted by bambino

Because the messenger, as you so liberally call it, is a lying piece of shit targeting a fringe segment of the conscious population.

Seems you got tangled up in their web of bull puckey.

Oh, and seems like everybody says so... these false prophets have been lying about Arizona from the jump. Proof below.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gateway_Pundit

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/gateway-pundit

https://www.politifact.com/personali...ateway-pundit/

https://www.newsguardtech.com/wp-con...tion-Label.pdf

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-gateway-pundit/

https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/07/media...oft/index.html

Because the messenger, as you so liberally call it, is a lying piece of shit targeting a fringe segment of the conscious population.

Seems you got tangled up in their web of bull puckey.

Oh, and seems like everybody says so... these false prophets have been lying about Arizona from the jump. Proof below.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gateway_Pundit

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/gateway-pundit

https://www.politifact.com/personali...ateway-pundit/

https://www.newsguardtech.com/wp-con...tion-Label.pdf

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-gateway-pundit/

https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/07/media...oft/index.html Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

if you say so

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSNBC_controversies


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wa..._controversies


China Daily advertising supplements

Dating back to 2011, The Washington Post began to include "China Watch" advertising supplements provided by China Daily, an English language newspaper owned by the Publicity Department of the Communist Party of China, on the print and online editions. Although the header to the online "China Watch" section included the text "A Paid Supplement to The Washington Post," James Fallows of The Atlantic suggested that the notice was not clear enough for most readers to see.[124] Distributed to the Post and multiple newspapers around the world, the "China Watch" advertising supplements range from four to eight pages and appear at least monthly. According to a 2018 report by The Guardian, "China Watch" uses "a didactic, old-school approach to propaganda."[125]


In 2020, a report by Freedom House, "Beijing's Global Megaphone," was also critical of the Post and other newspapers for distributing "China Watch".[126][127] In the same year, thirty-five Republican members of the U.S. Congress wrote a letter to the U.S. Department of Justice in February 2020 calling for an investigation of potential FARA violations by China Daily.[128] The letter named an article that appeared in the Post, "Education Flaws Linked to Hong Kong Unrest," as an example of "articles [that] serve as cover for China’s atrocities, including...its support for the crackdown in Hong Kong."[129] According to The Guardian, the Post had already stopped running "China Watch" in 2019.[130]


https://www.allsides.com/news-source/new-york-times


AllSides Media Bias Rating: Lean Left


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_controversies


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_co...ations_of_bias


CNN has often been the subject of allegations of party bias. In research conducted by the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard University and the Project for Excellence in Journalism, the authors found disparate treatment by CNN of Republican and Democratic candidates during the earliest five months of the presidential primaries in 2007: "The CNN programming studied tended to cast a negative light on Republican candidates—by a margin of three-to-one. Four-in-ten stories (41%) were clearly negative while just 14% were positive and 46% were neutral. The network provided negative coverage of all three main candidates with McCain fairing the worst (63% negative) and Romney fairing a little better than the others only because a majority of his coverage was neutral. It's not that Democrats, other than Obama, fared well on CNN either. Nearly half of the Illinois Senator's stories were positive (46%), vs. just 8% that were negative. But both Clinton and Edwards ended up with more negative than positive coverage overall. So while coverage for Democrats overall was a bit more positive than negative, that was almost all due to extremely favorable coverage for Obama."[1] In September 2009, a Pew Research Poll showed that Democrats were much more likely than Republicans to rate the network favorably, while Republicans were much more likely than Democrats to see CNN unfavorably.[2]


https://www.allsides.com/news-source...ews-media-bias


AllSides Media Bias Rating: Lean Left







oh snick! you thought you made a point. you did. just not the one you thought you did.

BHHAHHAHHAAAAAAAAA

From the video in the link you provided in post #25. Navarro is discussing the audit with Bannon. The chart shows the total of "Possible Illegal Votes" at 601,130.

The biggest category (305,701, or more than half) is titled "Absentee Ballots Cast That Were Requested Before & After Statutory Deadline". What does that mean? If the ballots were requested before the deadline, they may be valid. After the deadline, not.

The previous table, presumably from a day earlier in the audit, said the total of "Possible Illegal Votes" was 254,722. The biggest category had a different title - "Mail-In Ballots Cast By Voters Registered After the Registration Deadline" - and a nice round number of 150,000. If someone tried to add 150k names & addresses to the Maricopa County registration rolls after the deadline, I think it would have been noticed.

I'm all for strengthening voter integrity laws. But I want to see the fraud up close with my own eyes. We need to pinpoint exactly where it's coming from in order to stop it. Originally Posted by lustylad

bina sees dead people.

if you say so

explain this

gonna be the topic of my newest thread. the real racists in america

is this fake news?

Head-kicking attack in New York leaves Asian man, 61, in coma, sparks hate-crime investigation

https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...w-york-harlem/

the suspect is black. explain that in non-racist terms. we'll wait.

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

the big question is... will the black suspect be charged with a hate crime??? the money says no. I'd be shocked if he was.

most of the attacks on asians are from blacks. this is the fact media leaves out on purpose.

if they don't charge him with a hate crime, then there needs to be a lawsuit on the constitutionality on the hate crime laws. its used only on white people. I've not seen one used against a minority or other ethnic group.

oh goodie.. ding dong YR got bitched slapped over the media bias.

From the video in the link you provided in post #25. Navarro is discussing the audit with Bannon. The chart shows the total of "Possible Illegal Votes" at 601,130.

The biggest category (305,701, or more than half) is titled "Absentee Ballots Cast That Were Requested Before & After Statutory Deadline". What does that mean? If the ballots were requested before the deadline, they may be valid. After the deadline, not.

The previous table, presumably from a day earlier in the audit, said the total of "Possible Illegal Votes" was 254,722. The biggest category had a different title - "Mail-In Ballots Cast By Voters Registered After the Registration Deadline" - and a nice round number of 150,000. If someone tried to add 150k names & addresses to the Maricopa County registration rolls after the deadline, I think it would have been noticed.

I'm all for strengthening voter integrity laws. But I want to see the fraud up close with my own eyes. We need to pinpoint exactly where it's coming from in order to stop it. Originally Posted by lustylad

The margin in Az, Nevada and Georgia was around 10,000 votes. They would find that easily with forensic audits in those states. Wisconsin was 20,000. That too is an easy one. Throw in the hanky panky with the machines and who knows what will come out? Why are the Dems fighting so hard if nothing to hide? Why are Ducey and Kemp fighting so hard? Because they have something to hide. Our elections have to be cleaned up. The US should have zero tolerance for fraud. ZERO.you just can’t say it happens and shrug your shoulders. So don’t believe the WSJ when they say there isn’t widespread election fraud. Conduct forensic audits and let the chips fall where they may. So you can see with your own eyes.

if you say so

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSNBC_controversies


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wa..._controversies


China Daily advertising supplements

Dating back to 2011, The Washington Post began to include "China Watch" advertising supplements provided by China Daily, an English language newspaper owned by the Publicity Department of the Communist Party of China, on the print and online editions. Although the header to the online "China Watch" section included the text "A Paid Supplement to The Washington Post," James Fallows of The Atlantic suggested that the notice was not clear enough for most readers to see.[124] Distributed to the Post and multiple newspapers around the world, the "China Watch" advertising supplements range from four to eight pages and appear at least monthly. According to a 2018 report by The Guardian, "China Watch" uses "a didactic, old-school approach to propaganda."[125]


In 2020, a report by Freedom House, "Beijing's Global Megaphone," was also critical of the Post and other newspapers for distributing "China Watch".[126][127] In the same year, thirty-five Republican members of the U.S. Congress wrote a letter to the U.S. Department of Justice in February 2020 calling for an investigation of potential FARA violations by China Daily.[128] The letter named an article that appeared in the Post, "Education Flaws Linked to Hong Kong Unrest," as an example of "articles [that] serve as cover for China’s atrocities, including...its support for the crackdown in Hong Kong."[129] According to The Guardian, the Post had already stopped running "China Watch" in 2019.[130]


https://www.allsides.com/news-source/new-york-times


AllSides Media Bias Rating: Lean Left


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_controversies


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_co...ations_of_bias


CNN has often been the subject of allegations of party bias. In research conducted by the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard University and the Project for Excellence in Journalism, the authors found disparate treatment by CNN of Republican and Democratic candidates during the earliest five months of the presidential primaries in 2007: "The CNN programming studied tended to cast a negative light on Republican candidates—by a margin of three-to-one. Four-in-ten stories (41%) were clearly negative while just 14% were positive and 46% were neutral. The network provided negative coverage of all three main candidates with McCain fairing the worst (63% negative) and Romney fairing a little better than the others only because a majority of his coverage was neutral. It's not that Democrats, other than Obama, fared well on CNN either. Nearly half of the Illinois Senator's stories were positive (46%), vs. just 8% that were negative. But both Clinton and Edwards ended up with more negative than positive coverage overall. So while coverage for Democrats overall was a bit more positive than negative, that was almost all due to extremely favorable coverage for Obama."[1] In September 2009, a Pew Research Poll showed that Democrats were much more likely than Republicans to rate the network favorably, while Republicans were much more likely than Democrats to see CNN unfavorably.[2]


https://www.allsides.com/news-source...ews-media-bias


AllSides Media Bias Rating: Lean Left







oh snick! you thought you made a point. you did. just not the one you thought you did.

BHHAHHAHHAAAAAAAAA
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

And he went through all that trouble.

Says who? You? Prove what the article they posted is false? Have they’ve lost lawsuits like NYT, WAPO, CNN? I’m sure you regard those as credible yeah? That’s why you’re in a deep sleep. TGP isn’t far right, just the anti MSM. All you have is attacking the messenger, not the message. Predictable. Originally Posted by bambino

with the record of the nyt, wapo and cnn et al

they, in a fair world, should be banned from twitter and facebook for disinformation

with the record of the nyt, wapo and cnn et al

they, in a fair world, should be banned from twitter and facebook for disinformation Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

They should have been sued out of existence. But only nimrods support them. Maybe they’ll die a slow, tortuous death.

False headline.

Bogus story. Bogus news source. Hope you didn't get your vaccination advice from them, bambino. LOL!

Worthy of a big fat

SNICK


Nothing to see here. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Another ridiculous post by Bambino. No results have been released as of yet. It will be weeks before we hear anything official.