- txexetoo
- 08-28-2013, 09:31 AM
He broke zero laws. Whether what he did is moral may be another question
- Looking41today
- 08-29-2013, 12:04 AM
to Old but still going, for me this is a pretty clear picture. Im using deadly force when my life is in danger or the life of another human being. Family friend or stranger. If it is a life threatening situation I would shoot and shoot to kill. Not a shot in to the trees or ground to scare anyone either. If it is property at stake and not life, I don't shoot. You can disagree but that's what life is all about. I understand the gun laws in Texas and am thankfull I live here and not in California or New York where they differ. I don't know for sure but I bet the shooter in this case paid a lot more than $150 for his defense and would agree if he had it to do over he would have let the bitch go. But the law is the law and he lives with his decision. Originally Posted by smokeaterTotally agree with this.
- MrKlean
- 08-29-2013, 09:22 PM
A person should only use deadly force if life or significant bodily harm is at risk!
The idea that because someone steals a watch or car or _______ (whatever), it justifies being killed is foolish (no offence intended)!
People have insurance to cover valuable items from theft, so why the need to kill them (insurance or not).
The idea that a their should be killed, only means that certain people have had a very fortunate life, and grew up with parents that taught them morals!
Everyone did not grow up with parents, or people who taught them morals.
For all the posters that believe in a higher power, where did you learn that it was ok to kill someone for theft!
Lastly, I hate when posters talk big shit behind a computer.
Anyone here ever shoot someone? Kill someone?
The last question, what will make you do it again?
Life is too short, enjoy the time that you have left! Don't ruin the small amount of time you have left, regretting a decision on something frivolous.
$150, really......I'm shocked that anyone on this board would say that a life is only worth that much. It is sad, but a true reflection of a person's morals and values.
A person can only control what they do, not what another person does!
Happy Hobbying!
The idea that because someone steals a watch or car or _______ (whatever), it justifies being killed is foolish (no offence intended)!
People have insurance to cover valuable items from theft, so why the need to kill them (insurance or not).
The idea that a their should be killed, only means that certain people have had a very fortunate life, and grew up with parents that taught them morals!
Everyone did not grow up with parents, or people who taught them morals.
For all the posters that believe in a higher power, where did you learn that it was ok to kill someone for theft!
Lastly, I hate when posters talk big shit behind a computer.
Anyone here ever shoot someone? Kill someone?
The last question, what will make you do it again?
Life is too short, enjoy the time that you have left! Don't ruin the small amount of time you have left, regretting a decision on something frivolous.
$150, really......I'm shocked that anyone on this board would say that a life is only worth that much. It is sad, but a true reflection of a person's morals and values.
A person can only control what they do, not what another person does!
Happy Hobbying!